Appulse Corp (APL) — Net Asset Quality Index
Appulse Corp (APL) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 98.4% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$4.08 Million minus total liabilities of CA$64.25K yields net assets of CA$4.02 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See defensive interval ratio of Appulse Corp to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Appulse Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2002–2024)
This chart shows how Appulse Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2002 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 98.4%, representing net assets of CA$4.02 Million against total assets of CA$4.08 Million CAD. Explore APL cash flow metrics to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Appulse Corp (2002–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Appulse Corp from 2002 to 2024, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see APL market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 98.4% | CA$4.09 Million | CA$4.15 Million | CA$66.28K | ▲ +5.5 pp |
| 2023 | 92.9% | CA$8.36 Million | CA$9.00 Million | CA$639.28K | ▲ +29.3 pp |
| 2022 | 63.6% | CA$6.61 Million | CA$10.39 Million | CA$3.78 Million | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2021 | 60.3% | CA$6.25 Million | CA$10.36 Million | CA$4.11 Million | ▲ +5.3 pp |
| 2020 | 55.1% | CA$5.51 Million | CA$10.00 Million | CA$4.49 Million | ▲ +9.3 pp |
| 2019 | 45.7% | CA$4.40 Million | CA$9.62 Million | CA$5.22 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 45.9% | CA$3.44 Million | CA$7.50 Million | CA$4.06 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2017 | 43.9% | CA$3.22 Million | CA$7.33 Million | CA$4.12 Million | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2016 | 46.4% | CA$3.13 Million | CA$6.73 Million | CA$3.61 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2015 | 47.6% | CA$2.98 Million | CA$6.26 Million | CA$3.28 Million | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2014 | 44.9% | CA$2.82 Million | CA$6.28 Million | CA$3.46 Million | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2013 | 40.4% | CA$2.67 Million | CA$6.60 Million | CA$3.93 Million | ▼ -6.8 pp |
| 2012 | 47.2% | CA$2.89 Million | CA$6.12 Million | CA$3.24 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2011 | 49.2% | CA$2.66 Million | CA$5.40 Million | CA$2.75 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 49.2% | CA$2.66 Million | CA$5.40 Million | CA$2.75 Million | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2009 | 46.1% | CA$2.81 Million | CA$6.09 Million | CA$3.28 Million | ▼ -7.7 pp |
| 2008 | 53.9% | CA$3.42 Million | CA$6.35 Million | CA$2.93 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2007 | 54.8% | CA$3.60 Million | CA$6.57 Million | CA$2.97 Million | ▲ +9.1 pp |
| 2006 | 45.7% | CA$2.50 Million | CA$5.47 Million | CA$2.97 Million | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2005 | 41.9% | CA$1.85 Million | CA$4.42 Million | CA$2.57 Million | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2004 | 44.5% | CA$1.95 Million | CA$4.37 Million | CA$2.42 Million | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2003 | 39.1% | CA$1.55 Million | CA$3.97 Million | CA$2.42 Million | ▼ -55.0 pp |
| 2002 | 94.1% | CA$118.12K | CA$125.46K | CA$7.35K | — |