Bayhorse Silver Inc (BHS) — Net Asset Quality Index
Bayhorse Silver Inc (BHS) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -3.6% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$2.41 Million minus total liabilities of CA$2.49 Million yields net assets of CA$-86.84K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Also explore BHS total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Bayhorse Silver Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2005–2024)
This chart shows how Bayhorse Silver Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 20 annual periods from 2005 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at -3.6%, representing net assets of CA$-86.84K against total assets of CA$2.41 Million CAD. See BHS working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Bayhorse Silver Inc (2005–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Bayhorse Silver Inc from 2005 to 2024, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see BHS market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -18.4% | CA$-469.32K | CA$2.56 Million | CA$3.03 Million | ▼ -38.0 pp |
| 2023 | 19.7% | CA$495.13K | CA$2.52 Million | CA$2.02 Million | ▼ -30.5 pp |
| 2022 | 50.2% | CA$1.26 Million | CA$2.52 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2021 | 52.2% | CA$1.60 Million | CA$3.06 Million | CA$1.46 Million | ▲ +145.0 pp |
| 2020 | -92.8% | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$1.96 Million | CA$3.77 Million | ▼ -12.1 pp |
| 2019 | -80.7% | CA$-1.72 Million | CA$2.14 Million | CA$3.86 Million | ▲ +55.8 pp |
| 2018 | -136.5% | CA$-2.84 Million | CA$2.08 Million | CA$4.92 Million | ▼ -53.1 pp |
| 2017 | -83.5% | CA$-1.68 Million | CA$2.02 Million | CA$3.70 Million | ▲ +691.7 pp |
| 2016 | -775.1% | CA$-2.25 Million | CA$289.73K | CA$2.54 Million | ▲ +11389.3 pp |
| 2015 | -12164.4% | CA$-2.06 Million | CA$16.90K | CA$2.07 Million | ▼ -9403.0 pp |
| 2014 | -2761.3% | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$45.17K | CA$1.29 Million | ▼ -2701.3 pp |
| 2013 | -60.1% | CA$-496.83K | CA$826.76K | CA$1.32 Million | ▼ -13.5 pp |
| 2012 | -46.6% | CA$-440.72K | CA$946.64K | CA$1.39 Million | ▼ -82.7 pp |
| 2011 | 36.1% | CA$440.95K | CA$1.22 Million | CA$780.57K | ▼ -33.7 pp |
| 2010 | 69.8% | CA$556.92K | CA$798.19K | CA$241.27K | ▲ +355.6 pp |
| 2009 | -285.8% | CA$-102.29K | CA$35.79K | CA$138.07K | ▼ -298.2 pp |
| 2008 | 12.4% | CA$12.12K | CA$97.58K | CA$85.46K | ▼ -49.3 pp |
| 2007 | 61.7% | CA$203.27K | CA$329.37K | CA$126.11K | ▼ -32.1 pp |
| 2006 | 93.8% | CA$835.29K | CA$890.71K | CA$55.42K | ▲ +1899.0 pp |
| 2005 | -1805.2% | CA$-92.93K | CA$5.15K | CA$98.08K | — |