Bayhorse Silver Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Bayhorse Silver Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Bayhorse Silver Inc (BHS) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 587.2% as of September 2025. Working capital of CA$-509.99K (current assets of CA$1.44 Million minus current liabilities of CA$1.95 Million) is measured against net assets of CA$-86.84K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Bayhorse Silver Inc tangible book value ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Bayhorse Silver Inc (2005–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Bayhorse Silver Inc from 2005 to 2024. This chart shows how Bayhorse Silver Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 20 annual periods from 2005 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 587.2%, reflecting working capital of CA$-509.99K against net assets of CA$-86.84K CAD. See BHS cash and liquid assets coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Bayhorse Silver Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2005–2024)
Bayhorse Silver Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2005 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Bayhorse Silver Inc from 2005 to 2024, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see total assets of Bayhorse Silver Inc.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 236.4% | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$-469.32K | CA$1.37 Million | CA$2.48 Million | ▲ +316.6 pp |
| 2023 | -80.2% | CA$-397.00K | CA$495.13K | CA$1.08 Million | CA$1.47 Million | ▼ -44.8 pp |
| 2022 | -35.4% | CA$-447.24K | CA$1.26 Million | CA$809.52K | CA$1.26 Million | ▼ -15.4 pp |
| 2021 | -20.0% | CA$-319.64K | CA$1.60 Million | CA$1.14 Million | CA$1.46 Million | ▼ -203.1 pp |
| 2020 | 183.2% | CA$-3.33 Million | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$447.47K | CA$3.77 Million | ▲ +57.1 pp |
| 2019 | 126.1% | CA$-2.17 Million | CA$-1.72 Million | CA$601.33K | CA$2.78 Million | ▲ +60.4 pp |
| 2018 | 65.7% | CA$-1.87 Million | CA$-2.84 Million | CA$265.67K | CA$2.13 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2017 | 64.5% | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$-1.68 Million | CA$244.08K | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +14.1 pp |
| 2016 | 50.4% | CA$-1.13 Million | CA$-2.25 Million | CA$101.24K | CA$1.23 Million | ▼ -31.2 pp |
| 2015 | 81.6% | CA$-1.68 Million | CA$-2.06 Million | CA$16.90K | CA$1.69 Million | ▼ -18.4 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$45.17K | CA$1.29 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$-496.83K | CA$-496.83K | CA$826.76K | CA$1.32 Million | ▼ -198.1 pp |
| 2012 | 298.1% | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$-440.72K | CA$48.38K | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +456.1 pp |
| 2011 | -157.9% | CA$-696.35K | CA$440.95K | CA$59.52K | CA$755.87K | ▼ -235.0 pp |
| 2010 | 77.1% | CA$429.53K | CA$556.92K | CA$655.85K | CA$226.32K | ▼ -26.3 pp |
| 2009 | 103.4% | CA$-105.75K | CA$-102.29K | CA$32.32K | CA$138.07K | ▲ +37.9 pp |
| 2008 | 65.5% | CA$7.93K | CA$12.12K | CA$93.39K | CA$85.46K | ▲ +72.9 pp |
| 2007 | -7.4% | CA$-15.06K | CA$203.27K | CA$111.05K | CA$126.11K | ▼ -38.6 pp |
| 2006 | 31.2% | CA$260.87K | CA$835.29K | CA$316.28K | CA$55.42K | ▼ -68.8 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$-92.93K | CA$-92.93K | CA$5.15K | CA$98.08K | — |