Kore Mining Ltd (KORE) — Net Asset Quality Index
Kore Mining Ltd (KORE) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -37.0% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$2.38 Million minus total liabilities of CA$3.25 Million yields net assets of CA$-878.14K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. For live market cap and overall valuation, see KORE stock market capitalisation.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Kore Mining Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2024)
This chart shows how Kore Mining Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at -37.0%, representing net assets of CA$-878.14K against total assets of CA$2.38 Million CAD. See KORE net asset value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Kore Mining Ltd (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Kore Mining Ltd from 2001 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check Kore Mining Ltd strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.2% | CA$3.99K | CA$2.33 Million | CA$2.33 Million | ▼ -60.3 pp |
| 2023 | 60.5% | CA$1.29 Million | CA$2.13 Million | CA$841.41K | ▼ -16.9 pp |
| 2022 | 77.4% | CA$2.57 Million | CA$3.32 Million | CA$751.19K | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2021 | 84.5% | CA$5.25 Million | CA$6.21 Million | CA$961.35K | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2020 | 82.8% | CA$6.94 Million | CA$8.38 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2019 | 85.5% | CA$4.17 Million | CA$4.87 Million | CA$707.36K | ▲ +53.4 pp |
| 2018 | 32.1% | CA$697.02K | CA$2.17 Million | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -26.1 pp |
| 2017 | 58.2% | CA$475.75K | CA$818.02K | CA$342.26K | ▼ -16.1 pp |
| 2017 | 74.3% | CA$1.03 Million | CA$1.39 Million | CA$357.80K | ▼ -21.7 pp |
| 2016 | 96.0% | CA$751.19K | CA$782.33K | CA$31.14K | ▲ +70.3 pp |
| 2015 | 25.7% | CA$43.39K | CA$169.01K | CA$125.61K | ▲ +2499.2 pp |
| 2014 | -2473.5% | CA$-302.68K | CA$12.24K | CA$314.92K | ▼ -2286.1 pp |
| 2013 | -187.4% | CA$-150.69K | CA$80.42K | CA$231.11K | ▼ -114.4 pp |
| 2012 | -73.0% | CA$-91.28K | CA$125.08K | CA$216.35K | ▲ +62.9 pp |
| 2011 | -135.9% | CA$-70.80K | CA$52.11K | CA$122.90K | ▼ -232.3 pp |
| 2010 | 96.4% | CA$619.41K | CA$642.29K | CA$22.89K | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2009 | 97.8% | CA$670.53K | CA$685.30K | CA$14.77K | ▲ +18.3 pp |
| 2008 | 79.5% | CA$572.39K | CA$719.84K | CA$147.44K | ▲ +65.3 pp |
| 2007 | 14.2% | CA$88.32K | CA$623.27K | CA$534.95K | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2006 | 16.3% | CA$94.28K | CA$577.35K | CA$483.07K | ▼ -26.8 pp |
| 2005 | 43.1% | CA$235.60K | CA$546.88K | CA$311.28K | ▼ -10.6 pp |
| 2004 | 53.7% | CA$290.49K | CA$541.05K | CA$250.57K | ▼ -10.0 pp |
| 2003 | 63.7% | CA$328.26K | CA$515.46K | CA$187.20K | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2002 | 76.2% | CA$346.02K | CA$453.85K | CA$107.83K | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2001 | 82.0% | CA$392.45K | CA$478.55K | CA$86.11K | — |