Blue Moon Zinc Corp (MOON) — Net Asset Quality Index
Blue Moon Zinc Corp (MOON) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 86.5% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$292.89 Million minus total liabilities of CA$39.66 Million yields net assets of CA$253.23 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Blue Moon Zinc Corp earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Blue Moon Zinc Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2025)
This chart shows how Blue Moon Zinc Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 86.5%, representing net assets of CA$253.23 Million against total assets of CA$292.89 Million CAD. See Blue Moon Zinc Corp net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Blue Moon Zinc Corp (2007–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Blue Moon Zinc Corp from 2007 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see MOON company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 88.6% | CA$225.01 Million | CA$254.10 Million | CA$29.09 Million | ▲ +74.8 pp |
| 2024 | 13.8% | CA$4.46 Million | CA$32.37 Million | CA$27.92 Million | ▼ -68.1 pp |
| 2023 | 81.9% | CA$881.47K | CA$1.08 Million | CA$194.92K | ▲ +23.6 pp |
| 2022 | 58.3% | CA$440.04K | CA$755.00K | CA$314.96K | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2021 | 55.5% | CA$789.12K | CA$1.42 Million | CA$632.46K | ▲ +12.1 pp |
| 2020 | 43.4% | CA$428.93K | CA$988.06K | CA$559.14K | ▲ +8.2 pp |
| 2019 | 35.2% | CA$275.75K | CA$784.19K | CA$508.44K | ▲ +6.8 pp |
| 2018 | 28.4% | CA$209.02K | CA$736.54K | CA$527.52K | ▼ -48.5 pp |
| 2017 | 76.9% | CA$520.30K | CA$676.57K | CA$156.27K | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2016 | 70.7% | CA$336.61K | CA$475.90K | CA$139.29K | ▼ -14.9 pp |
| 2015 | 85.7% | CA$485.24K | CA$566.34K | CA$81.09K | ▼ -8.4 pp |
| 2014 | 94.1% | CA$2.00 Million | CA$2.13 Million | CA$126.64K | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2013 | 92.5% | CA$1.98 Million | CA$2.14 Million | CA$159.65K | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2012 | 95.0% | CA$1.83 Million | CA$1.93 Million | CA$95.54K | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2011 | 97.5% | CA$3.20 Million | CA$3.28 Million | CA$83.28K | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2010 | 94.9% | CA$4.58 Million | CA$4.82 Million | CA$244.11K | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2009 | 92.6% | CA$2.93 Million | CA$3.17 Million | CA$232.82K | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2008 | 97.6% | CA$2.12 Million | CA$2.17 Million | CA$51.64K | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2007 | 98.2% | CA$2.83 Million | CA$2.89 Million | CA$53.30K | — |