Blue Moon Zinc Corp (MOON) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Blue Moon Zinc Corp (MOON) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 11.6% as of March 2026. Working capital of CA$29.34 Million (current assets of CA$51.61 Million minus current liabilities of CA$22.26 Million) is measured against net assets of CA$253.23 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. For the complete balance sheet picture, see balance sheet size of Blue Moon Zinc Corp.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Blue Moon Zinc Corp Working Capital to Net Assets (2007–2025)
This chart shows how Blue Moon Zinc Corp's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 11.6%, reflecting working capital of CA$29.34 Million against net assets of CA$253.23 Million CAD. Explore MOON capex to operating cash flow ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Blue Moon Zinc Corp (2007–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Blue Moon Zinc Corp from 2007 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Read MOON current and long-term liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 38.6% | CA$86.88 Million | CA$225.01 Million | CA$99.62 Million | CA$12.75 Million | ▼ -34.0 pp |
| 2024 | 72.6% | CA$3.23 Million | CA$4.46 Million | CA$31.14 Million | CA$27.91 Million | ▲ +51.8 pp |
| 2023 | 20.8% | CA$183.46K | CA$881.47K | CA$378.38K | CA$194.92K | ▲ +34.0 pp |
| 2022 | -13.2% | CA$-57.97K | CA$440.04K | CA$56.99K | CA$114.96K | ▼ -24.7 pp |
| 2021 | 11.5% | CA$91.11K | CA$789.12K | CA$723.57K | CA$632.46K | ▲ +74.3 pp |
| 2020 | -62.7% | CA$-269.08K | CA$428.93K | CA$290.05K | CA$559.14K | ▲ +79.9 pp |
| 2019 | -142.6% | CA$-393.20K | CA$275.75K | CA$115.24K | CA$508.44K | ▲ +77.5 pp |
| 2018 | -220.0% | CA$-459.93K | CA$209.02K | CA$67.58K | CA$527.52K | ▼ -256.2 pp |
| 2017 | 36.2% | CA$188.33K | CA$520.30K | CA$344.60K | CA$156.27K | ▲ +35.0 pp |
| 2016 | 1.1% | CA$3.86K | CA$336.61K | CA$143.15K | CA$139.29K | ▼ -29.9 pp |
| 2015 | 31.1% | CA$150.74K | CA$485.24K | CA$231.84K | CA$81.09K | ▲ +11.2 pp |
| 2014 | 19.9% | CA$398.77K | CA$2.00 Million | CA$525.41K | CA$126.64K | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2013 | 34.2% | CA$678.21K | CA$1.98 Million | CA$837.85K | CA$159.65K | ▲ +11.5 pp |
| 2012 | 22.7% | CA$416.83K | CA$1.83 Million | CA$512.37K | CA$95.54K | ▲ +5.3 pp |
| 2011 | 17.4% | CA$557.20K | CA$3.20 Million | CA$640.48K | CA$83.28K | ▼ -14.5 pp |
| 2010 | 31.9% | CA$1.46 Million | CA$4.58 Million | CA$1.70 Million | CA$244.11K | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2009 | 26.0% | CA$763.28K | CA$2.93 Million | CA$996.10K | CA$232.82K | ▲ +19.2 pp |
| 2008 | 6.8% | CA$144.84K | CA$2.12 Million | CA$196.48K | CA$51.64K | ▼ -52.5 pp |
| 2007 | 59.3% | CA$1.68 Million | CA$2.83 Million | CA$1.73 Million | CA$53.30K | — |