Metallis Resources Inc. (MTS) — Net Asset Quality Index
Metallis Resources Inc. (MTS) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 61.3% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$869.22K minus total liabilities of CA$335.99K yields net assets of CA$533.22K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Metallis Resources Inc. (MTS) liquidity interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Metallis Resources Inc. Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Metallis Resources Inc.'s Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 61.3%, representing net assets of CA$533.22K against total assets of CA$869.22K CAD. Explore cash flow conversion of Metallis Resources Inc. to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Metallis Resources Inc. (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Metallis Resources Inc. from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see MTS company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 83.6% | CA$466.69K | CA$557.97K | CA$91.29K | ▲ +162.1 pp |
| 2023 | -78.4% | CA$-85.93K | CA$109.57K | CA$195.50K | ▼ -176.7 pp |
| 2022 | 98.3% | CA$14.75 Million | CA$15.01 Million | CA$258.82K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2021 | 99.5% | CA$13.70 Million | CA$13.77 Million | CA$68.23K | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2020 | 97.2% | CA$11.19 Million | CA$11.52 Million | CA$326.42K | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2019 | 95.6% | CA$8.48 Million | CA$8.87 Million | CA$391.96K | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2018 | 98.9% | CA$7.04 Million | CA$7.12 Million | CA$78.25K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2017 | 98.5% | CA$4.91 Million | CA$4.99 Million | CA$76.37K | ▲ +102.9 pp |
| 2016 | -4.4% | CA$-18.58K | CA$420.82K | CA$439.40K | ▲ +42.0 pp |
| 2015 | -46.4% | CA$-136.71K | CA$294.76K | CA$431.48K | ▼ -104.6 pp |
| 2014 | 58.3% | CA$348.16K | CA$597.55K | CA$249.38K | ▲ +26.6 pp |
| 2013 | 31.7% | CA$165.88K | CA$523.74K | CA$357.86K | ▼ -25.7 pp |
| 2012 | 57.4% | CA$1.08 Million | CA$1.88 Million | CA$802.90K | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2011 | 52.9% | CA$1.06 Million | CA$2.00 Million | CA$940.11K | ▼ -22.1 pp |
| 2010 | 75.0% | CA$2.13 Million | CA$2.84 Million | CA$711.09K | ▼ -8.3 pp |
| 2009 | 83.3% | CA$673.46K | CA$808.70K | CA$135.23K | ▼ -13.3 pp |
| 2008 | 96.6% | CA$249.94K | CA$258.71K | CA$8.77K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2007 | 96.3% | CA$284.06K | CA$295.10K | CA$11.04K | — |