Reliq Health Technologies Inc (RHT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Reliq Health Technologies Inc (RHT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 60.2% as of March 2023. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$22.29 Million minus total liabilities of CA$8.87 Million yields net assets of CA$13.42 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read RHT total liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Reliq Health Technologies Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2022)
This chart shows how Reliq Health Technologies Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2006 to 2022. As of March 2023, the index stands at 60.2%, representing net assets of CA$13.42 Million against total assets of CA$22.29 Million CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Reliq Health Technologies Inc market capitalisation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Reliq Health Technologies Inc (2006–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Reliq Health Technologies Inc from 2006 to 2022, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check RHT strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 62.1% | CA$6.37 Million | CA$10.27 Million | CA$3.90 Million | ▲ +33.1 pp |
| 2021 | 29.0% | CA$1.00 Million | CA$3.46 Million | CA$2.46 Million | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 2020 | 37.1% | CA$1.00 Million | CA$2.70 Million | CA$1.70 Million | ▼ -33.6 pp |
| 2019 | 70.8% | CA$2.66 Million | CA$3.76 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▼ -24.9 pp |
| 2018 | 95.7% | CA$11.83 Million | CA$12.36 Million | CA$531.21K | ▲ +93.0 pp |
| 2017 | 2.7% | CA$18.84K | CA$701.46K | CA$682.62K | ▲ +44.6 pp |
| 2016 | -41.9% | CA$-363.00K | CA$866.12K | CA$1.23 Million | ▼ -71.4 pp |
| 2015 | 29.5% | CA$275.72K | CA$934.63K | CA$658.91K | ▼ -20.1 pp |
| 2014 | 49.6% | CA$84.30K | CA$169.84K | CA$85.54K | ▼ -44.4 pp |
| 2013 | 94.0% | CA$629.68K | CA$669.84K | CA$40.16K | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2012 | 97.4% | CA$1.95 Million | CA$2.01 Million | CA$52.90K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2011 | 96.1% | CA$2.78 Million | CA$2.89 Million | CA$111.94K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2010 | 97.4% | CA$2.70 Million | CA$2.78 Million | CA$73.24K | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2009 | 92.7% | CA$908.78K | CA$980.76K | CA$71.98K | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2008 | 97.3% | CA$372.57K | CA$383.09K | CA$10.53K | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2006 | 95.8% | CA$99.27K | CA$103.66K | CA$4.39K | — |