Reliq Health Technologies Inc (RHT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Reliq Health Technologies Inc (RHT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 60.2% as of March 2023. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$22.29 Million minus total liabilities of CA$8.87 Million yields net assets of CA$13.42 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See RHT days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Reliq Health Technologies Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2022)
This chart shows how Reliq Health Technologies Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2006 to 2022. As of March 2023, the index stands at 60.2%, representing net assets of CA$13.42 Million against total assets of CA$22.29 Million CAD. Explore cash efficiency ratio of Reliq Health Technologies Inc to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Reliq Health Technologies Inc (2006–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Reliq Health Technologies Inc from 2006 to 2022, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Reliq Health Technologies Inc (RHT) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 62.1% | CA$6.37 Million | CA$10.27 Million | CA$3.90 Million | ▲ +33.1 pp |
| 2021 | 29.0% | CA$1.00 Million | CA$3.46 Million | CA$2.46 Million | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 2020 | 37.1% | CA$1.00 Million | CA$2.70 Million | CA$1.70 Million | ▼ -33.6 pp |
| 2019 | 70.8% | CA$2.66 Million | CA$3.76 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▼ -24.9 pp |
| 2018 | 95.7% | CA$11.83 Million | CA$12.36 Million | CA$531.21K | ▲ +93.0 pp |
| 2017 | 2.7% | CA$18.84K | CA$701.46K | CA$682.62K | ▲ +44.6 pp |
| 2016 | -41.9% | CA$-363.00K | CA$866.12K | CA$1.23 Million | ▼ -71.4 pp |
| 2015 | 29.5% | CA$275.72K | CA$934.63K | CA$658.91K | ▼ -20.1 pp |
| 2014 | 49.6% | CA$84.30K | CA$169.84K | CA$85.54K | ▼ -44.4 pp |
| 2013 | 94.0% | CA$629.68K | CA$669.84K | CA$40.16K | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2012 | 97.4% | CA$1.95 Million | CA$2.01 Million | CA$52.90K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2011 | 96.1% | CA$2.78 Million | CA$2.89 Million | CA$111.94K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2010 | 97.4% | CA$2.70 Million | CA$2.78 Million | CA$73.24K | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2009 | 92.7% | CA$908.78K | CA$980.76K | CA$71.98K | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2008 | 97.3% | CA$372.57K | CA$383.09K | CA$10.53K | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2006 | 95.8% | CA$99.27K | CA$103.66K | CA$4.39K | — |