Rugby Mining Limited Net Asset Quality Index
Rugby Mining Limited net asset quality index. Rugby Mining Limited (RUG) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -82.4% as of February 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$758.50K minus total liabilities of CA$1.38 Million yields net assets of CA$-625.25K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Rugby Mining Limited book value and equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Rugby Mining Limited (2007–2025)
Net asset quality index of Rugby Mining Limited from 2007 to 2025. This chart shows how Rugby Mining Limited's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of February 2025, the index stands at -82.4%, representing net assets of CA$-625.25K against total assets of CA$758.50K CAD. Check Rugby Mining Limited strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Rugby Mining Limited Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2007–2025)
Rugby Mining Limited net asset quality index by year from 2007 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Rugby Mining Limited from 2007 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Rugby Mining Limited.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -82.4% | CA$-625.25K | CA$758.50K | CA$1.38 Million | ▼ -163.8 pp |
| 2024 | 81.4% | CA$1.02 Million | CA$1.26 Million | CA$233.64K | ▲ +83.5 pp |
| 2023 | -2.1% | CA$-9.46K | CA$444.21K | CA$453.66K | ▼ -96.3 pp |
| 2022 | 94.2% | CA$9.10 Million | CA$9.66 Million | CA$559.87K | ▲ +28.5 pp |
| 2021 | 65.7% | CA$294.05K | CA$447.63K | CA$153.58K | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2020 | 88.9% | CA$503.08K | CA$566.04K | CA$62.96K | ▲ +19.1 pp |
| 2019 | 69.8% | CA$460.84K | CA$660.01K | CA$199.17K | ▼ -12.7 pp |
| 2018 | 82.5% | CA$451.36K | CA$547.06K | CA$95.70K | ▼ -8.8 pp |
| 2017 | 91.3% | CA$1.54 Million | CA$1.69 Million | CA$147.25K | ▲ +48.8 pp |
| 2016 | 42.5% | CA$258.90K | CA$609.30K | CA$350.40K | ▼ -47.4 pp |
| 2015 | 89.9% | CA$805.30K | CA$895.64K | CA$90.34K | ▼ -6.6 pp |
| 2014 | 96.6% | CA$3.05 Million | CA$3.16 Million | CA$108.87K | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 94.5% | CA$4.97 Million | CA$5.26 Million | CA$287.19K | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2012 | 90.5% | CA$4.10 Million | CA$4.53 Million | CA$431.85K | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2011 | 96.0% | CA$7.74 Million | CA$8.07 Million | CA$326.47K | ▲ +10.8 pp |
| 2010 | 85.1% | CA$822.86K | CA$966.50K | CA$143.64K | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2009 | 84.4% | CA$719.10K | CA$852.51K | CA$133.41K | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2008 | 97.0% | CA$973.90K | CA$1.00 Million | CA$30.52K | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2007 | 99.4% | CA$895.24K | CA$900.24K | CA$5.00K | — |