Rugby Mining Limited (RUG) — Net Asset Quality Index
Rugby Mining Limited (RUG) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -82.4% as of February 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$758.50K minus total liabilities of CA$1.38 Million yields net assets of CA$-625.25K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read RUG liabilities breakdown for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Rugby Mining Limited Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2025)
This chart shows how Rugby Mining Limited's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of February 2025, the index stands at -82.4%, representing net assets of CA$-625.25K against total assets of CA$758.50K CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Rugby Mining Limited worth.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Rugby Mining Limited (2007–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Rugby Mining Limited from 2007 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check RUG PP&E to net assets ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -82.4% | CA$-625.25K | CA$758.50K | CA$1.38 Million | ▼ -163.8 pp |
| 2024 | 81.4% | CA$1.02 Million | CA$1.26 Million | CA$233.64K | ▲ +83.5 pp |
| 2023 | -2.1% | CA$-9.46K | CA$444.21K | CA$453.66K | ▼ -96.3 pp |
| 2022 | 94.2% | CA$9.10 Million | CA$9.66 Million | CA$559.87K | ▲ +28.5 pp |
| 2021 | 65.7% | CA$294.05K | CA$447.63K | CA$153.58K | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2020 | 88.9% | CA$503.08K | CA$566.04K | CA$62.96K | ▲ +19.1 pp |
| 2019 | 69.8% | CA$460.84K | CA$660.01K | CA$199.17K | ▼ -12.7 pp |
| 2018 | 82.5% | CA$451.36K | CA$547.06K | CA$95.70K | ▼ -8.8 pp |
| 2017 | 91.3% | CA$1.54 Million | CA$1.69 Million | CA$147.25K | ▲ +48.8 pp |
| 2016 | 42.5% | CA$258.90K | CA$609.30K | CA$350.40K | ▼ -47.4 pp |
| 2015 | 89.9% | CA$805.30K | CA$895.64K | CA$90.34K | ▼ -6.6 pp |
| 2014 | 96.6% | CA$3.05 Million | CA$3.16 Million | CA$108.87K | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 94.5% | CA$4.97 Million | CA$5.26 Million | CA$287.19K | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2012 | 90.5% | CA$4.10 Million | CA$4.53 Million | CA$431.85K | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2011 | 96.0% | CA$7.74 Million | CA$8.07 Million | CA$326.47K | ▲ +10.8 pp |
| 2010 | 85.1% | CA$822.86K | CA$966.50K | CA$143.64K | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2009 | 84.4% | CA$719.10K | CA$852.51K | CA$133.41K | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2008 | 97.0% | CA$973.90K | CA$1.00 Million | CA$30.52K | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2007 | 99.4% | CA$895.24K | CA$900.24K | CA$5.00K | — |