Rugby Mining Limited (RUG) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Rugby Mining Limited (RUG) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 120.7% as of February 2025. Working capital of CA$-754.54K (current assets of CA$629.21K minus current liabilities of CA$1.38 Million) is measured against net assets of CA$-625.25K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See defensive interval ratio of Rugby Mining Limited to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Rugby Mining Limited Working Capital to Net Assets (2007–2025)
This chart shows how Rugby Mining Limited's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of February 2025, the ratio stands at 120.7%, reflecting working capital of CA$-754.54K against net assets of CA$-625.25K CAD. For the complete balance sheet picture, see RUG current and non-current assets.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Rugby Mining Limited (2007–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Rugby Mining Limited from 2007 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Read Rugby Mining Limited (RUG) financial obligations for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 120.7% | CA$-754.54K | CA$-625.25K | CA$629.21K | CA$1.38 Million | ▲ +34.5 pp |
| 2024 | 86.2% | CA$881.28K | CA$1.02 Million | CA$1.11 Million | CA$233.64K | ▼ -1659.8 pp |
| 2023 | 1746.0% | CA$-165.08K | CA$-9.46K | CA$288.58K | CA$453.66K | ▲ +1727.6 pp |
| 2022 | 18.4% | CA$1.67 Million | CA$9.10 Million | CA$2.19 Million | CA$519.87K | ▼ -63.2 pp |
| 2021 | 81.5% | CA$239.69K | CA$294.05K | CA$333.46K | CA$93.77K | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2020 | 86.9% | CA$437.01K | CA$503.08K | CA$499.96K | CA$62.96K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2019 | 85.7% | CA$394.77K | CA$460.84K | CA$593.94K | CA$199.17K | ▲ +20.2 pp |
| 2018 | 65.5% | CA$295.67K | CA$451.36K | CA$391.36K | CA$95.70K | ▼ -24.3 pp |
| 2017 | 89.8% | CA$1.38 Million | CA$1.54 Million | CA$1.53 Million | CA$147.25K | ▲ +21.3 pp |
| 2016 | 68.6% | CA$177.50K | CA$258.90K | CA$527.90K | CA$350.40K | ▼ -19.0 pp |
| 2015 | 87.6% | CA$705.30K | CA$805.30K | CA$795.64K | CA$90.34K | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 2014 | 96.5% | CA$2.94 Million | CA$3.05 Million | CA$3.05 Million | CA$108.87K | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2013 | 99.4% | CA$4.94 Million | CA$4.97 Million | CA$5.23 Million | CA$287.19K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2012 | 99.0% | CA$4.06 Million | CA$4.10 Million | CA$4.49 Million | CA$431.85K | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2011 | 99.6% | CA$7.71 Million | CA$7.74 Million | CA$8.04 Million | CA$326.47K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$822.86K | CA$822.86K | CA$966.50K | CA$143.64K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$719.10K | CA$719.10K | CA$852.51K | CA$133.41K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$973.90K | CA$973.90K | CA$1.00 Million | CA$30.52K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$895.24K | CA$895.24K | CA$900.24K | CA$5.00K | — |