UPM-Kymmene Oyj (UPM) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
UPM-Kymmene Oyj (UPM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 94.2% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (€600.00 Million) from net assets (€10.33 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See UPM-Kymmene Oyj (UPM) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
UPM-Kymmene Oyj Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1998–2024)
This chart shows how UPM-Kymmene Oyj's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 27 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 94.2%, reflecting net assets of €10.33 Billion with intangible assets of €600.00 Million EUR. See UPM cash and liquid assets coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for UPM-Kymmene Oyj (1998–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for UPM-Kymmene Oyj from 1998 to 2024, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see UPM-Kymmene Oyj market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (EUR) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 95.0% | €11.54 Billion | €580.00 Million | €19.10 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2023 | 93.8% | €11.53 Billion | €715.00 Million | €18.47 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2022 | 95.7% | €12.88 Billion | €552.00 Million | €22.21 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2021 | 96.7% | €11.11 Billion | €366.00 Million | €17.68 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2020 | 96.2% | €9.51 Billion | €363.00 Million | €14.86 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2019 | 96.8% | €10.18 Billion | €326.00 Million | €14.72 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 97.0% | €9.80 Billion | €296.00 Million | €14.00 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2017 | 96.6% | €8.66 Billion | €295.00 Million | €13.07 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2016 | 96.4% | €8.24 Billion | €299.00 Million | €13.91 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2015 | 95.9% | €7.94 Billion | €329.00 Million | €14.19 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 95.5% | €7.48 Billion | €340.00 Million | €14.20 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 95.4% | €7.46 Billion | €342.00 Million | €14.60 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2012 | 94.0% | €5.92 Billion | €357.00 Million | €12.89 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 93.9% | €7.48 Billion | €458.00 Million | €15.39 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 94.0% | €7.11 Billion | €424.00 Million | €13.81 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2009 | 93.6% | €6.60 Billion | €423.00 Million | €13.61 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2008 | 93.4% | €6.12 Billion | €403.00 Million | €13.78 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2007 | 94.2% | €6.78 Billion | €392.00 Million | €13.95 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2006 | 93.7% | €7.29 Billion | €460.68 Million | €14.47 Billion | ▲ +21.5 pp |
| 2005 | 72.2% | €7.36 Billion | €2.05 Billion | €15.53 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2004 | 72.9% | €7.66 Billion | €2.08 Billion | €15.87 Billion | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2003 | 67.5% | €6.89 Billion | €2.24 Billion | €14.49 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2002 | 66.2% | €6.96 Billion | €2.35 Billion | €15.39 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2001 | 64.5% | €6.85 Billion | €2.43 Billion | €16.46 Billion | ▼ -24.1 pp |
| 2000 | 88.6% | €6.17 Billion | €703.79 Million | €13.11 Billion | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 1999 | 94.4% | €5.29 Billion | €295.16 Million | €11.02 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 1998 | 94.4% | €5.31 Billion | €299.45 Million | €11.39 Billion | — |