Eminis Ambalaj Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Eminis Ambalaj Sanayi ve Ticaret AS tangible net worth ratio. Eminis Ambalaj Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (EMNIS) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of March 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (TL3.23K) from net assets (TL20.25 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check EMNIS capital-intensive asset ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Eminis Ambalaj Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (2004–2021)
Tangible net worth ratio of Eminis Ambalaj Sanayi ve Ticaret AS from 2004 to 2021. This chart shows how Eminis Ambalaj Sanayi ve Ticaret AS's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2004 to 2021. As of March 2022, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of TL20.25 Million with intangible assets of TL3.23K TRY. See Eminis Ambalaj Sanayi ve Ticaret AS working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Eminis Ambalaj Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2004–2021)
Eminis Ambalaj Sanayi ve Ticaret AS tangible net worth ratio by year from 2004 to 2021. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Eminis Ambalaj Sanayi ve Ticaret AS from 2004 to 2021, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see EMNIS stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (TRY) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 100.0% | TL15.61 Million | TL4.49K | TL97.24 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2020 | 99.8% | TL7.28 Million | TL11.76K | TL63.46 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2017 | 98.0% | TL4.85 Million | TL95.78K | TL62.39 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | TL6.52 Million | TL2.31K | TL54.43 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2015 | 99.7% | TL2.32 Million | TL6.77K | TL49.37 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 99.3% | TL5.01 Million | TL37.00K | TL49.90 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2013 | 98.3% | TL4.62 Million | TL78.00K | TL50.90 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2012 | 99.3% | TL13.03 Million | TL95.00K | TL47.24 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2011 | 99.5% | TL7.32 Million | TL35.00K | TL32.47 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 99.7% | TL10.32 Million | TL29.00K | TL44.97 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2009 | 99.7% | TL16.32 Million | TL56.00K | TL40.25 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2008 | 98.9% | TL9.51 Million | TL102.00K | TL35.64 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2007 | 99.3% | TL16.44 Million | TL116.00K | TL36.23 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2006 | 99.1% | TL17.36 Million | TL161.00K | TL36.91 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2005 | 98.8% | TL18.00 Million | TL221.00K | TL35.14 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2004 | 99.8% | TL19.65 Million | TL47.00K | TL34.99 Million | — |