Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 97.1% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($253.00K) from net assets ($8.85 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Acorn Energy, Inc. equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Acorn Energy, Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1990–2025)
This chart shows how Acorn Energy, Inc.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 29 annual periods from 1990 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 97.1%, reflecting net assets of $8.85 Million with intangible assets of $253.00K USD. Check Acorn Energy, Inc. strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Acorn Energy, Inc. (1990–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Acorn Energy, Inc. from 1990 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Acorn Energy, Inc. stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.7% | $8.32 Million | $22.00K | $13.33 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2024 | 99.6% | $5.58 Million | $21.00K | $10.60 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | $752.00K | $0.00 | $9.22 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $1.89 Million | $0.00 | $9.24 Million | ▲ +31.1 pp |
| 2015 | 68.9% | $1.66 Million | $516.00K | $24.33 Million | ▼ -12.2 pp |
| 2014 | 81.1% | $6.39 Million | $1.21 Million | $29.54 Million | ▼ -7.1 pp |
| 2013 | 88.1% | $31.51 Million | $3.73 Million | $50.96 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2012 | 81.6% | $51.95 Million | $9.56 Million | $67.34 Million | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 2011 | 93.1% | $69.57 Million | $4.78 Million | $85.81 Million | ▲ +15.3 pp |
| 2010 | 77.8% | $41.88 Million | $9.30 Million | $59.78 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2009 | 77.3% | $36.10 Million | $8.19 Million | $48.73 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2008 | 71.3% | $36.12 Million | $10.36 Million | $51.05 Million | ▼ -19.8 pp |
| 2007 | 91.1% | $67.33 Million | $5.99 Million | $96.97 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2005 | 90.1% | $820.00K | $81.00K | $10.17 Million | ▼ -7.6 pp |
| 2004 | 97.7% | $3.60 Million | $81.00K | $17.02 Million | ▲ +97.2 pp |
| 2003 | 0.5% | $4.57 Million | $4.54 Million | $17.67 Million | ▼ -38.5 pp |
| 2002 | 39.0% | $8.74 Million | $5.33 Million | $33.30 Million | ▼ -55.7 pp |
| 2001 | 94.6% | $16.95 Million | $909.00K | $39.29 Million | ▲ +7.1 pp |
| 2000 | 87.5% | $22.62 Million | $2.83 Million | $42.16 Million | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 1999 | 82.6% | $24.56 Million | $4.29 Million | $48.41 Million | ▼ -16.4 pp |
| 1998 | 98.9% | $65.00 Million | $700.00K | $73.20 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 1997 | 99.7% | $86.50 Million | $300.00K | $97.50 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 1996 | 99.5% | $95.30 Million | $500.00K | $102.10 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 1995 | 99.6% | $197.50 Million | $800.00K | $275.40 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 1994 | 99.2% | $89.30 Million | $700.00K | $129.30 Million | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 1993 | 92.2% | $38.40 Million | $3.00 Million | $71.70 Million | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 1992 | 83.3% | $13.80 Million | $2.30 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +30.7 pp |
| 1991 | 52.6% | $1.90 Million | $900.00K | $4.70 Million | ▲ +27.6 pp |
| 1990 | 25.0% | $1.20 Million | $900.00K | $4.40 Million | — |