Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($16.75 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See how liquid is Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common S's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 13 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $16.75 Million with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. See Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common S defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock from 2006 to 2025, covering 13 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common S market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.7% | $3.34 Million | $9.13K | $6.33 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2024 | 99.2% | $3.38 Million | $28.49K | $7.15 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2022 | 98.3% | $4.59 Million | $79.98K | $18.68 Million | ▲ +59.0 pp |
| 2015 | 39.2% | $2.58 Million | $1.57 Million | $18.75 Million | ▼ -43.8 pp |
| 2014 | 83.0% | $7.66 Million | $1.31 Million | $55.92 Million | ▼ -11.8 pp |
| 2013 | 94.7% | $16.66 Million | $879.54K | $28.54 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2012 | 98.5% | $34.23 Million | $500.88K | $43.52 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2011 | 99.4% | $50.00 Million | $308.79K | $61.42 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 99.8% | $146.57 Million | $259.44K | $160.02 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2009 | 99.9% | $154.32 Million | $167.03K | $172.66 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 99.9% | $139.62 Million | $137.78K | $154.21 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 99.8% | $48.62 Million | $91.22K | $49.82 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2006 | 99.7% | $10.90 Million | $37.57K | $11.29 Million | — |