Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.9% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($8.79K) from net assets ($16.75 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See what is Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common S's book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 13 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 99.9%, reflecting net assets of $16.75 Million with intangible assets of $8.79K USD. Also explore Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common S equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock from 2006 to 2025, covering 13 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common S market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.7% | $3.34 Million | $9.13K | $6.33 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2024 | 99.2% | $3.38 Million | $28.49K | $7.15 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2022 | 98.3% | $4.59 Million | $79.98K | $18.68 Million | ▲ +59.0 pp |
| 2015 | 39.2% | $2.58 Million | $1.57 Million | $18.75 Million | ▼ -43.8 pp |
| 2014 | 83.0% | $7.66 Million | $1.31 Million | $55.92 Million | ▼ -11.8 pp |
| 2013 | 94.7% | $16.66 Million | $879.54K | $28.54 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2012 | 98.5% | $34.23 Million | $500.88K | $43.52 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2011 | 99.4% | $50.00 Million | $308.79K | $61.42 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 99.8% | $146.57 Million | $259.44K | $160.02 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2009 | 99.9% | $154.32 Million | $167.03K | $172.66 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 99.9% | $139.62 Million | $137.78K | $154.21 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 99.8% | $48.62 Million | $91.22K | $49.82 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2006 | 99.7% | $10.90 Million | $37.57K | $11.29 Million | — |