Cimpress NV Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Cimpress NV tangible net worth ratio. Cimpress NV (CMPR) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -70.5% as of June 2019. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($332.54 Million) from net assets ($194.99 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Cimpress NV (CMPR) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Cimpress NV (2006–2019)
Tangible net worth ratio of Cimpress NV from 2006 to 2019. This chart shows how Cimpress NV's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 15 annual periods from 2006 to 2019. As of June 2019, the ratio stands at -70.5%, reflecting net assets of $194.99 Million with intangible assets of $332.54 Million USD. Check Cimpress NV (CMPR) strategic asset index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Cimpress NV Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2006–2019)
Cimpress NV tangible net worth ratio by year from 2006 to 2019. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Cimpress NV from 2006 to 2019, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see CMPR market cap overview.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | -70.5% | $194.99 Million | $332.54 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 2018 | -59.0% | $180.10 Million | $286.40 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +109.9 pp |
| 2017 | -168.9% | $120.62 Million | $324.39 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -175.2 pp |
| 2016 | 6.2% | $231.38 Million | $216.97 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +15.2 pp |
| 2016 | -9.0% | $231.38 Million | $252.18 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -52.6 pp |
| 2015 | 43.6% | $307.16 Million | $173.17 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2014 | 49.0% | $243.62 Million | $124.23 Million | $988.99 Million | ▼ -30.2 pp |
| 2013 | 79.2% | $189.56 Million | $39.41 Million | $601.57 Million | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2012 | 76.0% | $189.29 Million | $45.46 Million | $592.43 Million | ▼ -22.7 pp |
| 2011 | 98.7% | $450.09 Million | $6.05 Million | $555.90 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 98.3% | $376.11 Million | $6.43 Million | $477.89 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2009 | 97.6% | $285.53 Million | $6.75 Million | $369.55 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 97.8% | $242.50 Million | $5.38 Million | $315.95 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2007 | 97.1% | $176.06 Million | $5.12 Million | $234.85 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2006 | 96.9% | $123.98 Million | $3.83 Million | $171.39 Million | — |