Martin Midstream Partners LP (MMLP) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Martin Midstream Partners LP (MMLP) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 88.8% as of March 2019. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($18.41 Million) from net assets ($163.79 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See MMLP net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Martin Midstream Partners LP Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2001–2018)
This chart shows how Martin Midstream Partners LP's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 2001 to 2018. As of March 2019, the ratio stands at 88.8%, reflecting net assets of $163.79 Million with intangible assets of $18.41 Million USD. Also explore net asset momentum of Martin Midstream Partners LP to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Martin Midstream Partners LP (2001–2018)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Martin Midstream Partners LP from 2001 to 2018, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is Martin Midstream Partners LP worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 91.0% | $264.71 Million | $23.71 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2017 | 89.0% | $298.24 Million | $32.80 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2016 | 87.6% | $312.01 Million | $38.81 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2015 | 85.2% | $393.88 Million | $58.31 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2014 | 83.2% | $485.67 Million | $81.47 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -15.7 pp |
| 2013 | 99.0% | $260.42 Million | $2.70 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2012 | 99.9% | $357.96 Million | $198.00K | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +18.7 pp |
| 2011 | 81.3% | $285.62 Million | $53.54 Million | $949.11 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2010 | 80.1% | $274.81 Million | $54.77 Million | $785.48 Million | ▼ -5.6 pp |
| 2009 | 85.7% | $264.95 Million | $37.97 Million | $685.94 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2008 | 83.5% | $234.71 Million | $38.62 Million | $668.92 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 83.4% | $235.85 Million | $39.15 Million | $623.58 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2006 | 85.1% | $198.53 Million | $29.67 Million | $457.46 Million | ▲ +16.6 pp |
| 2005 | 68.4% | $95.56 Million | $30.15 Million | $389.04 Million | ▼ -27.7 pp |
| 2004 | 96.1% | $75.53 Million | $2.92 Million | $188.33 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2003 | 93.6% | $45.89 Million | $2.92 Million | $139.69 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2002 | 93.8% | $47.11 Million | $2.92 Million | $100.45 Million | ▲ +9.4 pp |
| 2001 | 84.4% | $18.76 Million | $2.92 Million | $88.95 Million | — |