Martin Midstream Partners LP (MMLP) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Martin Midstream Partners LP (MMLP) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 88.8% as of March 2019. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($18.41 Million) from net assets ($163.79 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See working capital to net assets of Martin Midstream Partners LP to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Martin Midstream Partners LP Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2001–2018)
This chart shows how Martin Midstream Partners LP's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 2001 to 2018. As of March 2019, the ratio stands at 88.8%, reflecting net assets of $163.79 Million with intangible assets of $18.41 Million USD. See operational self-sufficiency of Martin Midstream Partners LP to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Martin Midstream Partners LP (2001–2018)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Martin Midstream Partners LP from 2001 to 2018, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see MMLP market cap overview.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 91.0% | $264.71 Million | $23.71 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2017 | 89.0% | $298.24 Million | $32.80 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2016 | 87.6% | $312.01 Million | $38.81 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2015 | 85.2% | $393.88 Million | $58.31 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2014 | 83.2% | $485.67 Million | $81.47 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -15.7 pp |
| 2013 | 99.0% | $260.42 Million | $2.70 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2012 | 99.9% | $357.96 Million | $198.00K | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +18.7 pp |
| 2011 | 81.3% | $285.62 Million | $53.54 Million | $949.11 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2010 | 80.1% | $274.81 Million | $54.77 Million | $785.48 Million | ▼ -5.6 pp |
| 2009 | 85.7% | $264.95 Million | $37.97 Million | $685.94 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2008 | 83.5% | $234.71 Million | $38.62 Million | $668.92 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 83.4% | $235.85 Million | $39.15 Million | $623.58 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2006 | 85.1% | $198.53 Million | $29.67 Million | $457.46 Million | ▲ +16.6 pp |
| 2005 | 68.4% | $95.56 Million | $30.15 Million | $389.04 Million | ▼ -27.7 pp |
| 2004 | 96.1% | $75.53 Million | $2.92 Million | $188.33 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2003 | 93.6% | $45.89 Million | $2.92 Million | $139.69 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2002 | 93.8% | $47.11 Million | $2.92 Million | $100.45 Million | ▲ +9.4 pp |
| 2001 | 84.4% | $18.76 Million | $2.92 Million | $88.95 Million | — |