SBA Communications Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio
SBA Communications Corp tangible net worth ratio. SBA Communications Corp (SBAC) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -2437.0% as of June 2014. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($4.04 Billion) from net assets ($159.29 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check SBAC capital-intensive asset ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of SBA Communications Corp (1998–2013)
Tangible net worth ratio of SBA Communications Corp from 1998 to 2013. This chart shows how SBA Communications Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 15 annual periods from 1998 to 2013. As of June 2014, the ratio stands at -2437.0%, reflecting net assets of $159.29 Million with intangible assets of $4.04 Billion USD. See SBA Communications Corp current assets vs equity to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
SBA Communications Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1998–2013)
SBA Communications Corp tangible net worth ratio by year from 1998 to 2013. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for SBA Communications Corp from 1998 to 2013, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see SBAC market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | -848.9% | $356.97 Million | $3.39 Billion | $6.78 Billion | ▼ -477.4 pp |
| 2012 | -371.5% | $664.70 Million | $3.13 Billion | $6.60 Billion | ▲ +217875.2 pp |
| 2011 | -218246.7% | $751.00K | $1.64 Billion | $3.61 Billion | ▼ -217892.4 pp |
| 2010 | -354.4% | $330.13 Million | $1.50 Billion | $3.40 Billion | ▼ -215.1 pp |
| 2009 | -139.3% | $599.95 Million | $1.44 Billion | $3.31 Billion | ▲ +50.5 pp |
| 2008 | -189.8% | $491.76 Million | $1.43 Billion | $3.21 Billion | ▼ -32.2 pp |
| 2007 | -157.6% | $337.39 Million | $869.00 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▼ -69.7 pp |
| 2006 | -87.8% | $385.92 Million | $724.87 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -149.2 pp |
| 2005 | 61.3% | $81.43 Million | $31.49 Million | $952.54 Million | ▼ -33.2 pp |
| 2003 | 94.5% | $43.88 Million | $2.41 Million | $982.98 Million | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2002 | 97.7% | $185.47 Million | $4.32 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▲ +23.7 pp |
| 2001 | 74.0% | $450.64 Million | $117.09 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -10.5 pp |
| 2000 | 84.5% | $538.16 Million | $83.39 Million | $948.82 Million | ▲ +55.3 pp |
| 1999 | 29.2% | $48.60 Million | $34.40 Million | $429.80 Million | ▲ +21.2 pp |
| 1998 | 8.0% | $7.50 Million | $6.90 Million | $214.50 Million | — |