Eason Technology Limited (DXF) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Eason Technology Limited (DXF) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -64.4% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($46.10 Million) from net assets ($28.05 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore DXF net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Eason Technology Limited Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2008–2024)
This chart shows how Eason Technology Limited's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 15 annual periods from 2008 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at -64.4%, reflecting net assets of $28.05 Million with intangible assets of $46.10 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Eason Technology Limited worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Eason Technology Limited (2008–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Eason Technology Limited from 2008 to 2024, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore DXF capex reinvestment rate to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -64.4% | $28.05 Million | $46.10 Million | $70.86 Million | ▼ -164.4 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $288.16 Million | $5.00K | $600.27 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | $318.30 Million | $5.00K | $598.56 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $446.30 Million | $6.00K | $708.25 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | $367.07 Million | $9.00K | $641.77 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | $593.53 Million | $0.00 | $869.13 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $645.05 Million | $0.00 | $802.80 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2015 | 97.6% | $731.76 Million | $17.46 Million | $934.74 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2014 | 99.5% | $1.33 Billion | $6.38 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 99.4% | $1.50 Billion | $8.57 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 99.1% | $1.40 Billion | $12.70 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 99.3% | $1.23 Billion | $8.85 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | $1.00 Billion | $0.00 | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $228.41 Million | $0.00 | $286.49 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $147.40 Million | $0.00 | $220.40 Million | — |