Eason Technology Limited (DXF) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Eason Technology Limited (DXF) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 35.7% as of June 2025. Working capital of $10.01 Million (current assets of $24.56 Million minus current liabilities of $14.55 Million) is measured against net assets of $28.05 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Eason Technology Limited free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Eason Technology Limited Working Capital to Net Assets (2008–2023)
This chart shows how Eason Technology Limited's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 15 annual periods from 2008 to 2023. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 35.7%, reflecting working capital of $10.01 Million against net assets of $28.05 Million USD. See DXF cash and liquid assets coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Eason Technology Limited (2008–2023)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Eason Technology Limited from 2008 to 2023, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see how much is Eason Technology Limited worth.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 309.7% | $-158.44 Million | $-51.16 Million | $166.22 Million | $324.66 Million | ▲ +237.1 pp |
| 2022 | 72.6% | $209.24 Million | $288.16 Million | $443.49 Million | $234.25 Million | ▲ +15.2 pp |
| 2021 | 57.4% | $182.71 Million | $318.30 Million | $398.96 Million | $216.25 Million | ▲ +19.2 pp |
| 2020 | 38.2% | $170.32 Million | $446.30 Million | $378.01 Million | $207.69 Million | ▲ +49.6 pp |
| 2018 | -11.4% | $-41.88 Million | $367.07 Million | $163.68 Million | $205.56 Million | ▼ -113.0 pp |
| 2017 | 101.6% | $603.07 Million | $593.53 Million | $868.15 Million | $265.08 Million | ▲ +17.1 pp |
| 2016 | 84.5% | $545.19 Million | $645.05 Million | $545.71 Million | $518.00K | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2015 | 97.1% | $710.45 Million | $731.76 Million | $913.43 Million | $202.98 Million | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2014 | 94.3% | $1.26 Billion | $1.33 Billion | $1.54 Billion | $281.79 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2013 | 98.2% | $1.47 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $1.65 Billion | $173.26 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2012 | 97.4% | $1.37 Billion | $1.40 Billion | $1.61 Billion | $245.34 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 97.8% | $1.21 Billion | $1.23 Billion | $1.46 Billion | $257.34 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2010 | 99.3% | $996.17 Million | $1.00 Billion | $1.09 Billion | $98.69 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2009 | 98.8% | $225.63 Million | $228.41 Million | $283.71 Million | $58.08 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2008 | 97.8% | $144.11 Million | $147.40 Million | $217.10 Million | $73.00 Million | — |