Birks Group Inc (BGI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Birks Group Inc (BGI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -36.1% as of September 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($5.96 Million) from net assets ($4.38 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See how liquid is Birks Group Inc's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Birks Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2002–2022)
This chart shows how Birks Group Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 20 annual periods from 2002 to 2022. As of September 2022, the ratio stands at -36.1%, reflecting net assets of $4.38 Million with intangible assets of $5.96 Million USD. See defensive interval ratio of Birks Group Inc to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Birks Group Inc (2002–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Birks Group Inc from 2002 to 2022, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is Birks Group Inc worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -2.8% | $5.86 Million | $6.03 Million | $183.26 Million | ▲ +42.1 pp |
| 2020 | -44.9% | $3.41 Million | $4.94 Million | $210.65 Million | ▼ -113.0 pp |
| 2019 | 68.1% | $13.78 Million | $4.40 Million | $133.79 Million | ▼ -22.7 pp |
| 2018 | 90.8% | $32.53 Million | $3.01 Million | $120.47 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2017 | 94.5% | $17.06 Million | $932.19K | $238.63 Million | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2016 | 89.3% | $10.00 Million | $1.07 Million | $239.67 Million | ▲ +23.3 pp |
| 2015 | 66.0% | $3.58 Million | $1.22 Million | $228.46 Million | ▼ -26.1 pp |
| 2014 | 92.0% | $15.06 Million | $1.20 Million | $210.57 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 94.0% | $16.64 Million | $1.00 Million | $183.09 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2012 | 91.6% | $11.60 Million | $970.77K | $184.74 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2011 | 91.1% | $11.02 Million | $982.60K | $179.15 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2010 | 94.2% | $18.74 Million | $1.09 Million | $195.45 Million | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2009 | 99.9% | $44.15 Million | $51.09K | $260.28 Million | ▲ +13.6 pp |
| 2008 | 86.3% | $95.59 Million | $13.12 Million | $300.40 Million | ▲ +16.9 pp |
| 2007 | 69.4% | $94.01 Million | $28.77 Million | $291.30 Million | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 2006 | 61.6% | $78.54 Million | $30.17 Million | $267.54 Million | ▼ -37.8 pp |
| 2005 | 99.4% | $48.63 Million | $300.00K | $241.60 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2004 | 99.5% | $55.70 Million | $300.00K | $255.00 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $43.05 Million | $0.00 | $251.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $12.05 Million | $0.00 | $108.18 Million | — |