Birks Group Inc (BGI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Birks Group Inc (BGI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -36.1% as of September 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($5.96 Million) from net assets ($4.38 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Birks Group Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Birks Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2002–2022)
This chart shows how Birks Group Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 20 annual periods from 2002 to 2022. As of September 2022, the ratio stands at -36.1%, reflecting net assets of $4.38 Million with intangible assets of $5.96 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Birks Group Inc.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Birks Group Inc (2002–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Birks Group Inc from 2002 to 2022, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore Birks Group Inc capital spending ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -2.8% | $5.86 Million | $6.03 Million | $183.26 Million | ▲ +42.1 pp |
| 2020 | -44.9% | $3.41 Million | $4.94 Million | $210.65 Million | ▼ -113.0 pp |
| 2019 | 68.1% | $13.78 Million | $4.40 Million | $133.79 Million | ▼ -22.7 pp |
| 2018 | 90.8% | $32.53 Million | $3.01 Million | $120.47 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2017 | 94.5% | $17.06 Million | $932.19K | $238.63 Million | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2016 | 89.3% | $10.00 Million | $1.07 Million | $239.67 Million | ▲ +23.3 pp |
| 2015 | 66.0% | $3.58 Million | $1.22 Million | $228.46 Million | ▼ -26.1 pp |
| 2014 | 92.0% | $15.06 Million | $1.20 Million | $210.57 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 94.0% | $16.64 Million | $1.00 Million | $183.09 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2012 | 91.6% | $11.60 Million | $970.77K | $184.74 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2011 | 91.1% | $11.02 Million | $982.60K | $179.15 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2010 | 94.2% | $18.74 Million | $1.09 Million | $195.45 Million | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2009 | 99.9% | $44.15 Million | $51.09K | $260.28 Million | ▲ +13.6 pp |
| 2008 | 86.3% | $95.59 Million | $13.12 Million | $300.40 Million | ▲ +16.9 pp |
| 2007 | 69.4% | $94.01 Million | $28.77 Million | $291.30 Million | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 2006 | 61.6% | $78.54 Million | $30.17 Million | $267.54 Million | ▼ -37.8 pp |
| 2005 | 99.4% | $48.63 Million | $300.00K | $241.60 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2004 | 99.5% | $55.70 Million | $300.00K | $255.00 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $43.05 Million | $0.00 | $251.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $12.05 Million | $0.00 | $108.18 Million | — |