Birks Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Birks Group Inc tangible net worth ratio. Birks Group Inc (BGI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -36.1% as of September 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($5.96 Million) from net assets ($4.38 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore how fast is Birks Group Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Birks Group Inc (2002–2022)
Tangible net worth ratio of Birks Group Inc from 2002 to 2022. This chart shows how Birks Group Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 20 annual periods from 2002 to 2022. As of September 2022, the ratio stands at -36.1%, reflecting net assets of $4.38 Million with intangible assets of $5.96 Million USD. Check how strategically is Birks Group Inc's equity deployed to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Birks Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2002–2022)
Birks Group Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 2002 to 2022. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Birks Group Inc from 2002 to 2022, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Birks Group Inc (BGI) market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -2.8% | $5.86 Million | $6.03 Million | $183.26 Million | ▲ +42.1 pp |
| 2020 | -44.9% | $3.41 Million | $4.94 Million | $210.65 Million | ▼ -113.0 pp |
| 2019 | 68.1% | $13.78 Million | $4.40 Million | $133.79 Million | ▼ -22.7 pp |
| 2018 | 90.8% | $32.53 Million | $3.01 Million | $120.47 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2017 | 94.5% | $17.06 Million | $932.19K | $238.63 Million | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2016 | 89.3% | $10.00 Million | $1.07 Million | $239.67 Million | ▲ +23.3 pp |
| 2015 | 66.0% | $3.58 Million | $1.22 Million | $228.46 Million | ▼ -26.1 pp |
| 2014 | 92.0% | $15.06 Million | $1.20 Million | $210.57 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 94.0% | $16.64 Million | $1.00 Million | $183.09 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2012 | 91.6% | $11.60 Million | $970.77K | $184.74 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2011 | 91.1% | $11.02 Million | $982.60K | $179.15 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2010 | 94.2% | $18.74 Million | $1.09 Million | $195.45 Million | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2009 | 99.9% | $44.15 Million | $51.09K | $260.28 Million | ▲ +13.6 pp |
| 2008 | 86.3% | $95.59 Million | $13.12 Million | $300.40 Million | ▲ +16.9 pp |
| 2007 | 69.4% | $94.01 Million | $28.77 Million | $291.30 Million | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 2006 | 61.6% | $78.54 Million | $30.17 Million | $267.54 Million | ▼ -37.8 pp |
| 2005 | 99.4% | $48.63 Million | $300.00K | $241.60 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2004 | 99.5% | $55.70 Million | $300.00K | $255.00 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $43.05 Million | $0.00 | $251.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $12.05 Million | $0.00 | $108.18 Million | — |