Power REIT (PW) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Power REIT (PW) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 53.2% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($1.99 Million) from net assets ($4.25 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Power REIT book value and equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Power REIT Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2000–2025)
This chart shows how Power REIT's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 53.2%, reflecting net assets of $4.25 Million with intangible assets of $1.99 Million USD. Also explore PW net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Power REIT (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Power REIT from 2000 to 2025, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Power REIT (PW) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60.1% | $5.14 Million | $2.05 Million | $26.92 Million | ▼ -6.2 pp |
| 2024 | 66.3% | $6.75 Million | $2.28 Million | $46.10 Million | ▼ -25.6 pp |
| 2023 | 91.9% | $30.77 Million | $2.50 Million | $70.21 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2022 | 93.8% | $44.25 Million | $2.73 Million | $86.20 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2021 | 94.9% | $58.31 Million | $2.96 Million | $85.32 Million | ▲ +17.0 pp |
| 2020 | 78.0% | $15.21 Million | $3.35 Million | $40.54 Million | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2019 | 72.5% | $13.06 Million | $3.59 Million | $37.71 Million | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2018 | 68.6% | $12.19 Million | $3.83 Million | $21.90 Million | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2017 | 64.4% | $11.41 Million | $4.06 Million | $21.46 Million | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2016 | 60.1% | $10.78 Million | $4.30 Million | $21.21 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2015 | 57.2% | $10.61 Million | $4.54 Million | $21.75 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 57.2% | $11.16 Million | $4.78 Million | $22.34 Million | ▼ -40.2 pp |
| 2013 | 97.4% | $9.07 Million | $233.00K | $12.05 Million | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $9.35 Million | $0.00 | $10.64 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $10.12 Million | $0.00 | $10.13 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $9.20 Million | $0.00 | $9.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $9.20 Million | $0.00 | $9.21 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $9.17 Million | $0.00 | $9.19 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $9.17 Million | $0.00 | $9.19 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $9.18 Million | $0.00 | $9.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $9.18 Million | $0.00 | $9.20 Million | — |