Prestige Brand Holdings Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Prestige Brand Holdings Inc tangible net worth ratio. Prestige Brand Holdings Inc (PBH) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -21.8% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($2.30 Billion) from net assets ($1.89 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore net asset momentum of Prestige Brand Holdings Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Prestige Brand Holdings Inc (2001–2026)
Tangible net worth ratio of Prestige Brand Holdings Inc from 2001 to 2026. This chart shows how Prestige Brand Holdings Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 26 annual periods from 2001 to 2026. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at -21.8%, reflecting net assets of $1.89 Billion with intangible assets of $2.30 Billion USD. Check Prestige Brand Holdings Inc PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Prestige Brand Holdings Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2001–2026)
Prestige Brand Holdings Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 2001 to 2026. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Prestige Brand Holdings Inc from 2001 to 2026, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Prestige Brand Holdings Inc (PBH) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -21.8% | $1.89 Billion | $2.30 Billion | $3.55 Billion | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2025 | -25.1% | $1.83 Billion | $2.30 Billion | $3.40 Billion | ▲ +15.1 pp |
| 2024 | -40.2% | $1.66 Billion | $2.32 Billion | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +21.6 pp |
| 2023 | -61.8% | $1.45 Billion | $2.34 Billion | $3.35 Billion | ▲ +9.1 pp |
| 2022 | -70.9% | $1.58 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $3.67 Billion | ▲ +11.3 pp |
| 2021 | -82.3% | $1.36 Billion | $2.48 Billion | $3.43 Billion | ▲ +29.5 pp |
| 2020 | -111.7% | $1.17 Billion | $2.48 Billion | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +17.1 pp |
| 2019 | -128.8% | $1.10 Billion | $2.51 Billion | $3.44 Billion | ▲ +7.2 pp |
| 2018 | -135.9% | $1.18 Billion | $2.78 Billion | $3.76 Billion | ▲ +117.1 pp |
| 2017 | -253.0% | $822.55 Million | $2.90 Billion | $3.91 Billion | ▼ -40.9 pp |
| 2016 | -212.1% | $744.34 Million | $2.32 Billion | $2.95 Billion | ▲ +28.1 pp |
| 2015 | -240.1% | $627.62 Million | $2.13 Billion | $2.67 Billion | ▼ -92.5 pp |
| 2014 | -147.6% | $563.36 Million | $1.39 Billion | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +39.7 pp |
| 2013 | -187.3% | $477.94 Million | $1.37 Billion | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +60.4 pp |
| 2012 | -247.8% | $402.73 Million | $1.40 Billion | $1.76 Billion | ▼ -130.4 pp |
| 2011 | -117.3% | $361.83 Million | $786.36 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -47.4 pp |
| 2010 | -69.9% | $329.06 Million | $559.23 Million | $791.41 Million | ▲ +26.3 pp |
| 2009 | -96.2% | $294.38 Million | $577.59 Million | $801.38 Million | ▼ -61.2 pp |
| 2008 | -35.0% | $479.07 Million | $646.68 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +12.6 pp |
| 2007 | -47.6% | $445.33 Million | $657.16 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2006 | -55.6% | $409.41 Million | $637.20 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -79.3 pp |
| 2005 | 23.7% | $385.85 Million | $294.54 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +154.6 pp |
| 2004 | -131.0% | $126.51 Million | $292.20 Million | $326.62 Million | ▼ -231.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $43.86 Million | $0.00 | $142.06 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $58.74 Million | $0.00 | $174.04 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $46.03 Million | $0.00 | $151.29 Million | — |