Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc tangible net worth ratio. Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc (PDM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 86.7% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($118.19 Million) from net assets ($887.06 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore net asset momentum of Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc (2003–2024)
Tangible net worth ratio of Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc from 2003 to 2024. This chart shows how Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 22 annual periods from 2003 to 2024. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 86.7%, reflecting net assets of $887.06 Million with intangible assets of $118.19 Million USD. Check PDM strategic assets to equity ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2003–2024)
Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 2003 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc from 2003 to 2024, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 96.2% | $1.59 Billion | $60.48 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2023 | 95.2% | $1.72 Billion | $82.59 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2022 | 93.8% | $1.85 Billion | $114.38 Million | $4.09 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2021 | 94.7% | $1.79 Billion | $94.38 Million | $3.93 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2020 | 95.2% | $1.90 Billion | $90.59 Million | $3.74 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 95.5% | $1.82 Billion | $80.98 Million | $3.52 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 95.5% | $1.71 Billion | $77.68 Million | $3.59 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2017 | 96.1% | $1.99 Billion | $77.81 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2016 | 95.4% | $2.18 Billion | $99.69 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2015 | 96.1% | $2.20 Billion | $84.66 Million | $4.43 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2014 | 97.0% | $2.31 Billion | $70.18 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 97.0% | $2.46 Billion | $74.38 Million | $4.67 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2012 | 97.9% | $2.64 Billion | $54.74 Million | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2011 | 97.1% | $2.77 Billion | $79.25 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 97.3% | $2.77 Billion | $74.03 Million | $4.37 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2009 | 96.3% | $2.61 Billion | $96.27 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2008 | 95.2% | $2.70 Billion | $130.52 Million | $4.56 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2007 | 94.0% | $2.89 Billion | $172.43 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2006 | 92.2% | $2.86 Billion | $223.09 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2005 | 92.1% | $2.99 Billion | $235.41 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2004 | 92.0% | $3.91 Billion | $313.80 Million | $5.12 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2003 | 92.5% | $3.96 Billion | $297.60 Million | $4.93 Billion | — |