Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc (PDM) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc (PDM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 86.7% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($118.19 Million) from net assets ($887.06 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See PDM working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2003–2024)
This chart shows how Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 22 annual periods from 2003 to 2024. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 86.7%, reflecting net assets of $887.06 Million with intangible assets of $118.19 Million USD. See Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc liquidity coverage in days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc (2003–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc from 2003 to 2024, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc (PDM) market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 96.2% | $1.59 Billion | $60.48 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2023 | 95.2% | $1.72 Billion | $82.59 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2022 | 93.8% | $1.85 Billion | $114.38 Million | $4.09 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2021 | 94.7% | $1.79 Billion | $94.38 Million | $3.93 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2020 | 95.2% | $1.90 Billion | $90.59 Million | $3.74 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 95.5% | $1.82 Billion | $80.98 Million | $3.52 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 95.5% | $1.71 Billion | $77.68 Million | $3.59 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2017 | 96.1% | $1.99 Billion | $77.81 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2016 | 95.4% | $2.18 Billion | $99.69 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2015 | 96.1% | $2.20 Billion | $84.66 Million | $4.43 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2014 | 97.0% | $2.31 Billion | $70.18 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 97.0% | $2.46 Billion | $74.38 Million | $4.67 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2012 | 97.9% | $2.64 Billion | $54.74 Million | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2011 | 97.1% | $2.77 Billion | $79.25 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 97.3% | $2.77 Billion | $74.03 Million | $4.37 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2009 | 96.3% | $2.61 Billion | $96.27 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2008 | 95.2% | $2.70 Billion | $130.52 Million | $4.56 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2007 | 94.0% | $2.89 Billion | $172.43 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2006 | 92.2% | $2.86 Billion | $223.09 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2005 | 92.1% | $2.99 Billion | $235.41 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2004 | 92.0% | $3.91 Billion | $313.80 Million | $5.12 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2003 | 92.5% | $3.96 Billion | $297.60 Million | $4.93 Billion | — |