Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc (PDM) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc (PDM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 86.7% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($118.19 Million) from net assets ($887.06 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore PDM net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2003–2024)
This chart shows how Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 22 annual periods from 2003 to 2024. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 86.7%, reflecting net assets of $887.06 Million with intangible assets of $118.19 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc (PDM) total market value.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc (2003–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc from 2003 to 2024, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore PDM capex reinvestment rate to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 96.2% | $1.59 Billion | $60.48 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2023 | 95.2% | $1.72 Billion | $82.59 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2022 | 93.8% | $1.85 Billion | $114.38 Million | $4.09 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2021 | 94.7% | $1.79 Billion | $94.38 Million | $3.93 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2020 | 95.2% | $1.90 Billion | $90.59 Million | $3.74 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 95.5% | $1.82 Billion | $80.98 Million | $3.52 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 95.5% | $1.71 Billion | $77.68 Million | $3.59 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2017 | 96.1% | $1.99 Billion | $77.81 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2016 | 95.4% | $2.18 Billion | $99.69 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2015 | 96.1% | $2.20 Billion | $84.66 Million | $4.43 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2014 | 97.0% | $2.31 Billion | $70.18 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 97.0% | $2.46 Billion | $74.38 Million | $4.67 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2012 | 97.9% | $2.64 Billion | $54.74 Million | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2011 | 97.1% | $2.77 Billion | $79.25 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 97.3% | $2.77 Billion | $74.03 Million | $4.37 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2009 | 96.3% | $2.61 Billion | $96.27 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2008 | 95.2% | $2.70 Billion | $130.52 Million | $4.56 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2007 | 94.0% | $2.89 Billion | $172.43 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2006 | 92.2% | $2.86 Billion | $223.09 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2005 | 92.1% | $2.99 Billion | $235.41 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2004 | 92.0% | $3.91 Billion | $313.80 Million | $5.12 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2003 | 92.5% | $3.96 Billion | $297.60 Million | $4.93 Billion | — |