Sequans Communications SA Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Sequans Communications SA tangible net worth ratio. Sequans Communications SA (SQNS) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 80.2% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($8.26 Million) from net assets ($41.71 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check Sequans Communications SA PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Sequans Communications SA (2008–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Sequans Communications SA from 2008 to 2025. This chart shows how Sequans Communications SA's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 12 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 80.2%, reflecting net assets of $41.71 Million with intangible assets of $8.26 Million USD. See Sequans Communications SA (SQNS) working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Sequans Communications SA Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2008–2025)
Sequans Communications SA tangible net worth ratio by year from 2008 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sequans Communications SA from 2008 to 2025, covering 12 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see SQNS market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 93.3% | $127.72 Million | $8.52 Million | $248.95 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2024 | 89.8% | $55.36 Million | $5.64 Million | $106.53 Million | ▲ +2304.7 pp |
| 2022 | -2214.9% | $2.10 Million | $48.70 Million | $98.75 Million | ▼ -2084.4 pp |
| 2017 | -130.5% | $4.15 Million | $9.56 Million | $57.06 Million | ▼ -143.5 pp |
| 2016 | 13.0% | $8.86 Million | $7.71 Million | $65.08 Million | ▼ -73.3 pp |
| 2014 | 86.3% | $25.11 Million | $3.44 Million | $49.41 Million | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2013 | 92.1% | $58.93 Million | $4.68 Million | $73.53 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2012 | 92.5% | $55.47 Million | $4.18 Million | $68.40 Million | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2011 | 95.0% | $84.24 Million | $4.23 Million | $101.03 Million | ▲ +10.2 pp |
| 2010 | 84.8% | $20.70 Million | $3.14 Million | $49.72 Million | ▲ +162.3 pp |
| 2009 | -77.5% | $893.00K | $1.58 Million | $28.81 Million | ▼ -163.8 pp |
| 2008 | 86.3% | $14.81 Million | $2.03 Million | $34.59 Million | — |