Companhia Estadual de Distribuição de Energia Elétrica (CEED3) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Companhia Estadual de Distribuição de Energia Elétrica (CEED3) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -18905.2% as of March 2015. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (R$1.70 Billion) from net assets (R$8.95 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Companhia Estadual de Distribuição de En short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Companhia Estadual de Distribuição de Energia Elétrica Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2007–2014)
This chart shows how Companhia Estadual de Distribuição de Energia Elétrica's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 8 annual periods from 2007 to 2014. As of March 2015, the ratio stands at -18905.2%, reflecting net assets of R$8.95 Million with intangible assets of R$1.70 Billion BRL. See how many days can Companhia Estadual de Distribuição de En fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Companhia Estadual de Distribuição de Energia Elétrica (2007–2014)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Companhia Estadual de Distribuição de Energia Elétrica from 2007 to 2014, covering 8 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market value of Companhia Estadual de Distribuição de En.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (BRL) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | -1773.1% | R$88.01 Million | R$1.65 Billion | R$2.96 Billion | ▼ -1607.2 pp |
| 2013 | -165.9% | R$511.34 Million | R$1.36 Billion | R$3.00 Billion | ▼ -157.0 pp |
| 2012 | -8.9% | R$1.06 Billion | R$1.15 Billion | R$3.49 Billion | ▼ -29.7 pp |
| 2011 | 20.9% | R$1.23 Billion | R$970.12 Million | R$3.83 Billion | ▼ -23.6 pp |
| 2010 | 44.5% | R$1.75 Billion | R$970.25 Million | R$4.02 Billion | ▼ -54.9 pp |
| 2009 | 99.4% | R$1.94 Billion | R$11.94 Million | R$4.03 Billion | ▲ +45.3 pp |
| 2008 | 54.1% | R$24.87 Million | R$11.42 Million | R$1.87 Billion | ▲ +20.2 pp |
| 2007 | 33.9% | R$15.98 Million | R$10.57 Million | R$1.78 Billion | — |