Bravida Holding AB (BRAV) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Bravida Holding AB (BRAV) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (Skr0.00) from net assets (Skr9.51 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Bravida Holding AB (BRAV) working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Bravida Holding AB Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2002–2025)
This chart shows how Bravida Holding AB's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of Skr9.51 Billion with intangible assets of Skr0.00 SEK. See BRAV defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bravida Holding AB (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bravida Holding AB from 2002 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see BRAV company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (SEK) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | Skr9.13 Billion | Skr2.00 Million | Skr23.46 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | Skr8.83 Billion | Skr1.00 Million | Skr23.87 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | Skr8.27 Billion | Skr1.00 Million | Skr24.33 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2022 | 99.6% | Skr7.93 Billion | Skr34.00 Million | Skr22.47 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | Skr6.83 Billion | Skr3.00 Million | Skr19.52 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | Skr5.88 Billion | Skr1.00 Million | Skr17.05 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 99.9% | Skr5.60 Billion | Skr3.00 Million | Skr16.51 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 99.9% | Skr5.24 Billion | Skr6.00 Million | Skr14.32 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2017 | 99.8% | Skr4.66 Billion | Skr10.00 Million | Skr13.36 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 99.7% | Skr4.08 Billion | Skr12.00 Million | Skr11.96 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 99.6% | Skr3.55 Billion | Skr12.63 Million | Skr11.40 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2014 | 99.9% | Skr3.31 Billion | Skr2.87 Million | Skr11.06 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 99.9% | Skr3.70 Billion | Skr3.87 Million | Skr10.67 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 99.9% | Skr3.38 Billion | Skr4.51 Million | Skr10.07 Billion | ▲ +103.7 pp |
| 2011 | -3.9% | Skr2.12 Billion | Skr2.20 Billion | Skr5.92 Billion | ▲ +53.6 pp |
| 2010 | -57.5% | Skr1.35 Billion | Skr2.13 Billion | Skr5.00 Billion | ▼ -32.4 pp |
| 2009 | -25.1% | Skr1.72 Billion | Skr2.15 Billion | Skr6.09 Billion | ▲ +29.4 pp |
| 2008 | -54.4% | Skr1.21 Billion | Skr1.87 Billion | Skr5.42 Billion | ▲ +18.8 pp |
| 2007 | -73.3% | Skr1.07 Billion | Skr1.86 Billion | Skr5.15 Billion | ▲ +45.7 pp |
| 2006 | -118.9% | Skr891.05 Million | Skr1.95 Billion | Skr5.25 Billion | ▼ -28.7 pp |
| 2005 | -90.2% | Skr547.40 Million | Skr1.04 Billion | Skr3.47 Billion | ▼ -49.3 pp |
| 2004 | -40.9% | Skr879.00 Million | Skr1.24 Billion | Skr4.85 Billion | ▲ +186.5 pp |
| 2003 | -227.4% | Skr657.16 Million | Skr2.15 Billion | Skr5.97 Billion | ▼ -139.0 pp |
| 2002 | -88.4% | Skr1.07 Billion | Skr2.02 Billion | Skr5.16 Billion | — |