AlphaTON Capital Corp. Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
AlphaTON Capital Corp. working capital to net assets ratio. AlphaTON Capital Corp. (ATON) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -28.4% as of December 2025. Working capital of $-2.52 Million (current assets of $19.02 Million minus current liabilities of $21.54 Million) is measured against net assets of $8.88 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check AlphaTON Capital Corp. tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of AlphaTON Capital Corp. (1998–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of AlphaTON Capital Corp. from 1998 to 2025. This chart shows how AlphaTON Capital Corp.'s Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 25 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at -28.4%, reflecting working capital of $-2.52 Million against net assets of $8.88 Million USD. See AlphaTON Capital Corp. (ATON) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
AlphaTON Capital Corp. Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
AlphaTON Capital Corp. working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for AlphaTON Capital Corp. from 1998 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see ATON current and non-current assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -136.0% | $1.12 Million | $-827.00K | $2.23 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -280.7 pp |
| 2024 | 144.7% | $4.82 Million | $3.33 Million | $7.70 Million | $2.88 Million | ▲ +129.0 pp |
| 2023 | 15.7% | $11.81 Million | $75.39 Million | $13.68 Million | $1.86 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2022 | 14.5% | $24.05 Million | $165.43 Million | $24.83 Million | $783.00K | ▲ +13.4 pp |
| 2021 | 1.2% | $1.74 Million | $147.60 Million | $4.95 Million | $3.21 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2020 | 0.8% | $1.23 Million | $145.64 Million | $3.79 Million | $2.57 Million | ▼ -76.8 pp |
| 2018 | 77.6% | $7.46 Million | $9.62 Million | $7.62 Million | $151.00K | ▼ -21.4 pp |
| 2017 | 99.0% | $59.03 Million | $59.59 Million | $59.14 Million | $109.06K | ▲ +61.8 pp |
| 2016 | 37.3% | $4.59 Million | $12.33 Million | $4.89 Million | $299.74K | ▲ +10.2 pp |
| 2015 | 27.1% | $1.12 Million | $4.12 Million | $1.74 Million | $620.56K | ▼ -13.7 pp |
| 2014 | 40.8% | $2.07 Million | $5.07 Million | $2.26 Million | $191.97K | ▼ -59.0 pp |
| 2013 | 99.8% | $2.98 Million | $2.98 Million | $3.43 Million | $446.87K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 99.9% | $4.85 Million | $4.85 Million | $7.51 Million | $2.66 Million | ▲ +80.2 pp |
| 2011 | 19.6% | $1.76 Million | $8.94 Million | $2.44 Million | $682.75K | ▲ +14.3 pp |
| 2010 | 5.4% | $364.07K | $6.77 Million | $3.82 Million | $3.45 Million | ▼ -94.0 pp |
| 2009 | 99.3% | $1.13 Million | $1.14 Million | $1.25 Million | $120.39K | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2008 | 99.9% | $5.03 Million | $5.03 Million | $5.08 Million | $57.34K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $5.74 Million | $5.74 Million | $5.78 Million | $42.00K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $4.53 Million | $4.53 Million | $4.68 Million | $141.52K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $-214.26K | $-214.26K | $19.54K | $233.80K | ▲ +2837.3 pp |
| 2002 | -2737.3% | $-83.65K | $3.06K | $42.83K | $126.48K | ▼ -2806.6 pp |
| 2001 | 69.3% | $333.94K | $481.93K | $428.56K | $94.62K | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2000 | 63.9% | $1.02 Million | $1.60 Million | $1.17 Million | $151.67K | ▲ +46.1 pp |
| 1999 | 17.8% | $19.01K | $106.97K | $84.15K | $65.14K | ▼ -90.9 pp |
| 1998 | 108.7% | $-492.66K | $-453.32K | $4.01K | $496.67K | — |