Golden Matrix Group Inc (GMGI) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Golden Matrix Group Inc (GMGI) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -45.2% as of January 2026. Working capital of $-22.78 Million (current assets of $30.48 Million minus current liabilities of $53.26 Million) is measured against net assets of $50.43 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See GMGI net asset quality score to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Golden Matrix Group Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (2008–2025)
This chart shows how Golden Matrix Group Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of January 2026, the ratio stands at -45.2%, reflecting working capital of $-22.78 Million against net assets of $50.43 Million USD. Check Golden Matrix Group Inc (GMGI) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Golden Matrix Group Inc (2008–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Golden Matrix Group Inc from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see GMGI market cap.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -49.9% | $-24.13 Million | $48.34 Million | $35.44 Million | $59.57 Million | ▼ -33.0 pp |
| 2024 | -17.0% | $-18.48 Million | $108.95 Million | $45.07 Million | $63.55 Million | ▼ -76.0 pp |
| 2023 | 59.1% | $18.37 Million | $31.10 Million | $22.85 Million | $4.48 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2022 | 55.6% | $16.57 Million | $29.80 Million | $19.29 Million | $2.72 Million | ▼ -43.1 pp |
| 2021 | 98.8% | $18.69 Million | $18.93 Million | $20.04 Million | $1.35 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $13.26 Million | $13.26 Million | $13.81 Million | $552.61K | ▼ -14.0 pp |
| 2019 | 114.0% | $1.18 Million | $1.03 Million | $3.01 Million | $1.83 Million | ▲ +14.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | $-1.34 Million | $-1.34 Million | $819.87K | $2.16 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | $-1.54 Million | $-1.54 Million | $87.67K | $1.62 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $-3.98 Million | $-3.98 Million | $12.30K | $3.99 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2015 | 103.0% | $-2.91 Million | $-2.82 Million | $63.12K | $2.97 Million | ▼ -6.1 pp |
| 2014 | 109.1% | $-1.01 Million | $-929.63K | $79.88K | $1.09 Million | ▼ -24.8 pp |
| 2013 | 133.9% | $-338.94K | $-253.07K | $829.00 | $339.76K | ▼ -12.1 pp |
| 2012 | 146.1% | $-275.37K | $-188.52K | $15.76K | $291.13K | ▲ +46.1 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $-82.16K | $-82.16K | $47.59K | $129.75K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | $-21.94K | $-21.94K | $79.11K | $101.05K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $4.57K | $4.57K | $17.96K | $13.39K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $28.66K | $28.66K | $31.37K | $2.71K | — |