Nukkleus Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Nukkleus Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Nukkleus Inc (NUKK) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 100.3% as of September 2025. Working capital of $-30.51 Million (current assets of $13.12 Million minus current liabilities of $43.63 Million) is measured against net assets of $-30.42 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check NUKK tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Nukkleus Inc (2013–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Nukkleus Inc from 2013 to 2025. This chart shows how Nukkleus Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 13 annual periods from 2013 to 2025. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 100.3%, reflecting working capital of $-30.51 Million against net assets of $-30.42 Million USD. See NUKK cash and liquid assets coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Nukkleus Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2013–2025)
Nukkleus Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2013 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Nukkleus Inc from 2013 to 2025, covering 13 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Nukkleus Inc (NUKK) total assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.3% | $-30.51 Million | $-30.42 Million | $13.12 Million | $43.63 Million | ▲ +14.3 pp |
| 2024 | 86.0% | $-6.10 Million | $-7.10 Million | $965.71K | $7.07 Million | ▲ +120.8 pp |
| 2023 | -34.8% | $-3.79 Million | $10.89 Million | $3.69 Million | $7.47 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | -34.8% | $-3.79 Million | $10.89 Million | $3.69 Million | $7.47 Million | ▼ -21.5 pp |
| 2021 | -13.3% | $-1.59 Million | $12.02 Million | $3.04 Million | $4.64 Million | ▼ -113.3 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $-1.39 Million | $-1.39 Million | $3.80 Million | $5.19 Million | ▲ +19.0 pp |
| 2019 | 81.0% | $-1.05 Million | $-1.29 Million | $203.00K | $1.25 Million | ▲ +24.2 pp |
| 2018 | 56.7% | $-319.66K | $-563.53K | $305.77K | $625.43K | ▲ +247.6 pp |
| 2017 | -190.9% | $670.56K | $-351.35K | $1.10 Million | $434.39K | ▲ +137.6 pp |
| 2016 | -328.4% | $776.37K | $-236.38K | $1.18 Million | $400.44K | ▼ -428.4 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | $-22.13K | $-22.13K | $0.00 | $22.13K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | $-1.66K | $-1.66K | $12.90K | $14.56K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $19.15K | $19.15K | $22.66K | $3.51K | — |