Surgepays Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Surgepays Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Surgepays Inc (SURG) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 102.7% as of June 2026. Working capital of $-21.30 Million (current assets of $4.86 Million minus current liabilities of $26.16 Million) is measured against net assets of $-20.75 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check SURG intangible-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Surgepays Inc (2006–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Surgepays Inc from 2006 to 2025. This chart shows how Surgepays Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 102.7%, reflecting working capital of $-21.30 Million against net assets of $-20.75 Million USD. See SURG defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Surgepays Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2006–2025)
Surgepays Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2006 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Surgepays Inc from 2006 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Surgepays Inc assets under control.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 72.8% | $-11.21 Million | $-15.40 Million | $6.98 Million | $18.19 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2024 | 77.4% | $11.81 Million | $15.26 Million | $17.87 Million | $6.06 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2023 | 72.7% | $20.66 Million | $28.40 Million | $33.37 Million | $12.71 Million | ▼ -7.4 pp |
| 2022 | 80.1% | $4.10 Million | $5.12 Million | $27.56 Million | $23.46 Million | ▼ -29.6 pp |
| 2021 | 109.7% | $3.89 Million | $3.55 Million | $13.89 Million | $10.00 Million | ▼ -21.4 pp |
| 2020 | 131.0% | $-14.05 Million | $-10.73 Million | $1.25 Million | $15.30 Million | ▲ +57.0 pp |
| 2019 | 74.0% | $-3.48 Million | $-4.70 Million | $3.57 Million | $7.05 Million | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2018 | 87.1% | $-1.73 Million | $-1.99 Million | $3.06 Million | $4.79 Million | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 2017 | 93.5% | $502.95K | $538.18K | $2.99 Million | $2.49 Million | ▼ -72.1 pp |
| 2016 | 165.6% | $-3.01 Million | $-1.82 Million | $2.39 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -205.4 pp |
| 2015 | 371.0% | $-2.25 Million | $-606.75K | $346.04K | $2.60 Million | ▲ +371.6 pp |
| 2014 | -0.6% | $461.00 | $-79.91K | $315.43K | $314.97K | ▼ -100.8 pp |
| 2013 | 100.2% | $-833.07K | $-831.00K | $726.00 | $833.80K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.3% | $-770.89K | $-768.72K | $683.00 | $771.57K | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2010 | 102.0% | $-115.57K | $-113.27K | $9.38K | $124.95K | ▲ +97.0 pp |
| 2009 | 5.0% | $-11.93K | $-237.60K | $101.59K | $113.51K | ▼ -177.8 pp |
| 2007 | 182.8% | $-7.73K | $-4.23K | $4.31K | $12.04K | ▲ +82.8 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $62.55K | $62.55K | $74.97K | $12.42K | — |