Glacier Lake Resources Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Glacier Lake Resources Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Glacier Lake Resources Inc (GLI) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 102.1% as of December 2025. Working capital of CA$-1.55 Million (current assets of CA$125.73K minus current liabilities of CA$1.68 Million) is measured against net assets of CA$-1.52 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Glacier Lake Resources Inc (2009–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Glacier Lake Resources Inc from 2009 to 2025. This chart shows how Glacier Lake Resources Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2009 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 102.1%, reflecting working capital of CA$-1.55 Million against net assets of CA$-1.52 Million CAD. Explore how much of Glacier Lake Resources Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Glacier Lake Resources Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2009–2025)
Glacier Lake Resources Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2009 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Glacier Lake Resources Inc from 2009 to 2025, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see balance sheet size of Glacier Lake Resources Inc.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 103.0% | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$162.03K | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2024 | 108.0% | CA$-429.71K | CA$-397.71K | CA$229.93K | CA$659.64K | ▲ +18.3 pp |
| 2023 | 89.7% | CA$278.58K | CA$310.58K | CA$396.55K | CA$117.97K | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2022 | 96.9% | CA$998.63K | CA$1.03 Million | CA$1.03 Million | CA$32.60K | ▲ +126.1 pp |
| 2021 | -29.2% | CA$-85.74K | CA$293.54K | CA$254.10K | CA$339.85K | ▼ -87.9 pp |
| 2020 | 58.7% | CA$497.94K | CA$848.93K | CA$663.72K | CA$165.78K | ▼ -184.3 pp |
| 2019 | 243.0% | CA$-596.47K | CA$-245.47K | CA$41.85K | CA$638.31K | ▲ +218.1 pp |
| 2018 | 24.9% | CA$307.34K | CA$1.23 Million | CA$630.23K | CA$322.88K | ▼ -46.3 pp |
| 2017 | 71.2% | CA$319.53K | CA$448.89K | CA$481.11K | CA$161.58K | ▼ -28.8 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$104.28K | CA$104.28K | CA$339.25K | CA$234.97K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$6.15K | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$25.78K | CA$1.10 Million | ▼ -5.6 pp |
| 2013 | 105.6% | CA$-752.84K | CA$-712.66K | CA$45.11K | CA$797.95K | ▲ +236.9 pp |
| 2012 | -131.2% | CA$-395.26K | CA$301.20K | CA$48.64K | CA$443.90K | ▼ -142.7 pp |
| 2011 | 11.5% | CA$161.66K | CA$1.41 Million | CA$233.23K | CA$71.57K | ▼ -63.8 pp |
| 2010 | 75.3% | CA$1.44 Million | CA$1.92 Million | CA$1.49 Million | CA$47.83K | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2009 | 70.8% | CA$248.78K | CA$351.13K | CA$259.14K | CA$10.36K | — |