Anika Therapeutics Inc Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Anika Therapeutics Inc capital reinvestment ratio. Anika Therapeutics Inc (ANIK) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.14x as of December 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($4.64 Million) in capital expenditures ($648.00K). Check how aggressively does Anika Therapeutics Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of Anika Therapeutics Inc (1997–2025)
Capital reinvestment ratio of Anika Therapeutics Inc from 1997 to 2025. This chart tracks Anika Therapeutics Inc's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 26 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Anika Therapeutics Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Anika Therapeutics Inc Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Anika Therapeutics Inc capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ANIK cash generation efficiency.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.61x | $11.19 Million | $6.83 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2024 | 1.43x | $5.40 Million | $7.73 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2022 | 1.70x | $4.41 Million | $7.49 Million | ▲ +177.2% |
| 2021 | 0.61x | $8.40 Million | $5.14 Million | ▲ +391.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $13.06 Million | $1.63 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $37.01 Million | $2.83 Million | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $34.92 Million | $4.66 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $40.81 Million | $8.98 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2016 | 0.59x | $23.80 Million | $14.01 Million | ▲ +149.3% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $39.06 Million | $9.22 Million | ▲ +507.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $39.98 Million | $1.55 Million | ▲ +121.7% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $25.16 Million | $440.89K | ▼ -87.7% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $10.55 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $10.17 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $7.85 Million | $2.78 Million | ▼ -72.3% |
| 2009 | 1.28x | $3.09 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2008 | 4.77x | $3.41 Million | $16.25 Million | ▲ +45.2% |
| 2007 | 3.28x | $4.49 Million | $14.76 Million | ▲ +403.3% |
| 2006 | 0.65x | $2.00 Million | $1.31 Million | ▲ +163.1% |
| 2005 | 0.25x | $6.45 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +1146.4% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $23.82 Million | $474.00K | ▼ -84.4% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $2.01 Million | $256.00K | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $332.03K | $88.91K | ▼ -87.4% |
| 1999 | 2.13x | $800.00K | $1.70 Million | ▲ +228.4% |
| 1998 | 0.65x | $3.40 Million | $2.20 Million | ▲ +460.8% |
| 1997 | 0.12x | $2.60 Million | $300.00K | — |