Anika Therapeutics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Anika Therapeutics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Anika Therapeutics Inc (ANIK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-684.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($46.19 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Anika Therapeutics Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Anika Therapeutics Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Anika Therapeutics Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Anika Therapeutics Inc across 33 annual periods. Check Anika Therapeutics Inc (ANIK) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Anika Therapeutics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Anika Therapeutics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Anika Therapeutics Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ANIK cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.24x | $11.19 Million | $46.80 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $5.40 Million | $48.75 Million | ▲ +461.8% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-1.79 Million | $58.37 Million | ▼ -144.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $4.41 Million | $63.56 Million | ▼ -50.1% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $8.40 Million | $60.45 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $13.06 Million | $93.20 Million | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2019 | 0.87x | $37.01 Million | $42.33 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2018 | 2.27x | $34.92 Million | $15.38 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2017 | 2.13x | $40.81 Million | $19.13 Million | ▲ +56.7% |
| 2016 | 1.36x | $23.80 Million | $17.47 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2015 | 1.57x | $39.06 Million | $24.90 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2014 | 2.51x | $39.98 Million | $15.90 Million | ▲ +103.9% |
| 2013 | 1.23x | $25.16 Million | $20.41 Million | ▲ +287.4% |
| 2012 | 0.32x | $10.55 Million | $33.14 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $10.17 Million | $38.08 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $7.85 Million | $43.75 Million | ▲ +181.7% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $3.09 Million | $48.56 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $3.41 Million | $35.06 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $4.49 Million | $24.54 Million | ▲ +107.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $2.00 Million | $22.63 Million | ▼ -66.1% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | $6.45 Million | $24.73 Million | ▼ -68.0% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $23.82 Million | $29.18 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $2.01 Million | $3.89 Million | ▲ +371.0% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $332.03K | $3.02 Million | ▲ +107.2% |
| 2001 | -1.53x | $-4.31 Million | $2.81 Million | ▼ -84.6% |
| 2000 | -0.83x | $-1.88 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -806.4% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $800.00K | $6.80 Million | ▼ -91.3% |
| 1998 | 1.36x | $3.40 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 1997 | 1.04x | $2.60 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +279.6% |
| 1996 | -0.58x | $-1.10 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 1995 | -0.77x | $-1.70 Million | $2.20 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 1994 | -1.04x | $-2.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -505.2% |
| 1993 | -0.17x | $-500.00K | $2.90 Million | — |