Anika Therapeutics Inc (ANIK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Anika Therapeutics Inc (ANIK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-684.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($46.19 Million) in one year. See ANIK financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Anika Therapeutics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Anika Therapeutics Inc across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Anika Therapeutics Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Anika Therapeutics Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Anika Therapeutics Inc. Check ANIK cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.24x | $11.19 Million | $46.80 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $5.40 Million | $48.75 Million | ▲ +461.8% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-1.79 Million | $58.37 Million | ▼ -144.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $4.41 Million | $63.56 Million | ▼ -50.1% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $8.40 Million | $60.45 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $13.06 Million | $93.20 Million | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2019 | 0.87x | $37.01 Million | $42.33 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2018 | 2.27x | $34.92 Million | $15.38 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2017 | 2.13x | $40.81 Million | $19.13 Million | ▲ +56.7% |
| 2016 | 1.36x | $23.80 Million | $17.47 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2015 | 1.57x | $39.06 Million | $24.90 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2014 | 2.51x | $39.98 Million | $15.90 Million | ▲ +103.9% |
| 2013 | 1.23x | $25.16 Million | $20.41 Million | ▲ +287.4% |
| 2012 | 0.32x | $10.55 Million | $33.14 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $10.17 Million | $38.08 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $7.85 Million | $43.75 Million | ▲ +181.7% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $3.09 Million | $48.56 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $3.41 Million | $35.06 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $4.49 Million | $24.54 Million | ▲ +107.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $2.00 Million | $22.63 Million | ▼ -66.1% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | $6.45 Million | $24.73 Million | ▼ -68.0% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $23.82 Million | $29.18 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $2.01 Million | $3.89 Million | ▲ +371.0% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $332.03K | $3.02 Million | ▲ +107.2% |
| 2001 | -1.53x | $-4.31 Million | $2.81 Million | ▼ -84.6% |
| 2000 | -0.83x | $-1.88 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -806.4% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $800.00K | $6.80 Million | ▼ -91.3% |
| 1998 | 1.36x | $3.40 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 1997 | 1.04x | $2.60 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +279.6% |
| 1996 | -0.58x | $-1.10 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 1995 | -0.77x | $-1.70 Million | $2.20 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 1994 | -1.04x | $-2.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -505.2% |
| 1993 | -0.17x | $-500.00K | $2.90 Million | — |