Anika Therapeutics Inc (ANIK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Anika Therapeutics Inc (ANIK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.85 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($45.49 Million) in one year. See ANIK free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Anika Therapeutics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Anika Therapeutics Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Anika Therapeutics Inc (ANIK) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Anika Therapeutics Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Anika Therapeutics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ANIK market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.24x | $11.19 Million | $46.80 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $5.40 Million | $48.75 Million | ▲ +461.8% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-1.79 Million | $58.37 Million | ▼ -144.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $4.41 Million | $63.56 Million | ▼ -50.1% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $8.40 Million | $60.45 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $13.06 Million | $93.20 Million | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2019 | 0.87x | $37.01 Million | $42.33 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2018 | 2.27x | $34.92 Million | $15.38 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2017 | 2.13x | $40.81 Million | $19.13 Million | ▲ +56.7% |
| 2016 | 1.36x | $23.80 Million | $17.47 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2015 | 1.57x | $39.06 Million | $24.90 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2014 | 2.51x | $39.98 Million | $15.90 Million | ▲ +103.9% |
| 2013 | 1.23x | $25.16 Million | $20.41 Million | ▲ +287.4% |
| 2012 | 0.32x | $10.55 Million | $33.14 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $10.17 Million | $38.08 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $7.85 Million | $43.75 Million | ▲ +181.7% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $3.09 Million | $48.56 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $3.41 Million | $35.06 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $4.49 Million | $24.54 Million | ▲ +107.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $2.00 Million | $22.63 Million | ▼ -66.1% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | $6.45 Million | $24.73 Million | ▼ -68.0% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $23.82 Million | $29.18 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $2.01 Million | $3.89 Million | ▲ +371.0% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $332.03K | $3.02 Million | ▲ +107.2% |
| 2001 | -1.53x | $-4.31 Million | $2.81 Million | ▼ -84.6% |
| 2000 | -0.83x | $-1.88 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -806.4% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $800.00K | $6.80 Million | ▼ -91.3% |
| 1998 | 1.36x | $3.40 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 1997 | 1.04x | $2.60 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +279.6% |
| 1996 | -0.58x | $-1.10 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 1995 | -0.77x | $-1.70 Million | $2.20 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 1994 | -1.04x | $-2.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -505.2% |
| 1993 | -0.17x | $-500.00K | $2.90 Million | — |