Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.19x as of March 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($3.28 Million) in capital expenditures ($634.98K). Check Canterbury Park Holding Corporation tangible book value ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1996–2025)
This chart tracks Canterbury Park Holding Corporation's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Canterbury Park Holding Corporation cash conversion from operations.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation from 1996 to 2025. See Canterbury Park Holding Corporation free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.47x | $8.90 Million | $4.18 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2024 | 1.84x | $6.52 Million | $11.98 Million | ▲ +168.0% |
| 2023 | 0.69x | $11.54 Million | $7.91 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2022 | 0.45x | $11.22 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $13.50 Million | $3.78 Million | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2020 | 0.92x | $1.68 Million | $1.54 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2019 | 2.25x | $6.74 Million | $15.17 Million | ▲ +159.1% |
| 2018 | 0.87x | $6.33 Million | $5.50 Million | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2017 | 0.53x | $7.09 Million | $3.78 Million | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2016 | 0.90x | $4.94 Million | $4.43 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2015 | 1.04x | $4.43 Million | $4.60 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2014 | 1.23x | $4.59 Million | $5.66 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2013 | 1.22x | $3.54 Million | $4.31 Million | ▲ +339.8% |
| 2012 | 0.28x | $4.06 Million | $1.12 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $3.44 Million | $720.36K | ▼ -79.4% |
| 2010 | 1.02x | $2.98 Million | $3.04 Million | ▲ +89.4% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | $1.93 Million | $1.04 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2008 | 1.28x | $1.65 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +174.3% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $4.61 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2006 | 0.68x | $5.97 Million | $4.07 Million | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2005 | 0.77x | $4.96 Million | $3.81 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2004 | 0.70x | $6.59 Million | $4.64 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2003 | 0.78x | $4.78 Million | $3.72 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2002 | 0.88x | $3.90 Million | $3.43 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2001 | 0.56x | $3.88 Million | $2.17 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2000 | 1.17x | $3.56 Million | $4.16 Million | ▲ +133.6% |
| 1999 | 0.50x | $1.00 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +133.3% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $1.40 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -80.2% |
| 1997 | 1.08x | $1.20 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +170.8% |
| 1996 | 0.40x | $1.00 Million | $400.00K | — |