Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.28 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($18.90 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Canterbury Park Holding Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Canterbury Park Holding Corporation cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation. Check Canterbury Park Holding Corporation cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.30x | $8.90 Million | $29.52 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $6.52 Million | $25.83 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | $11.54 Million | $22.88 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2022 | 0.53x | $11.22 Million | $21.09 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2021 | 0.72x | $13.50 Million | $18.71 Million | ▲ +653.5% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $1.68 Million | $17.51 Million | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2019 | 0.42x | $6.74 Million | $16.00 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2018 | 0.43x | $6.33 Million | $14.69 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2017 | 0.51x | $7.09 Million | $13.82 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2016 | 0.38x | $4.94 Million | $13.07 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | $4.43 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $4.59 Million | $8.50 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | $3.54 Million | $8.85 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2012 | 0.51x | $4.06 Million | $8.01 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2011 | 0.51x | $3.44 Million | $6.71 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $2.98 Million | $6.10 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2009 | 0.43x | $1.93 Million | $4.45 Million | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $1.65 Million | $5.56 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $4.61 Million | $7.53 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2006 | 0.80x | $5.97 Million | $7.49 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | $4.96 Million | $7.08 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2004 | 0.91x | $6.59 Million | $7.23 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2003 | 0.87x | $4.78 Million | $5.47 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2002 | 0.76x | $3.90 Million | $5.12 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2001 | 0.83x | $3.88 Million | $4.69 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2000 | 1.00x | $3.56 Million | $3.55 Million | ▲ +70.3% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $1.00 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 1998 | 0.50x | $1.40 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $1.20 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 1996 | 0.29x | $1.00 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +407.1% |
| 1995 | -0.09x | $-400.00K | $4.30 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1994 | -0.13x | $-400.00K | $3.00 Million | — |