Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.28 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($18.90 Million) in one year. Explore Canterbury Park Holding Corporation long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.30x | $8.90 Million | $29.52 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $6.52 Million | $25.83 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | $11.54 Million | $22.88 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2022 | 0.53x | $11.22 Million | $21.09 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2021 | 0.72x | $13.50 Million | $18.71 Million | ▲ +653.5% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $1.68 Million | $17.51 Million | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2019 | 0.42x | $6.74 Million | $16.00 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2018 | 0.43x | $6.33 Million | $14.69 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2017 | 0.51x | $7.09 Million | $13.82 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2016 | 0.38x | $4.94 Million | $13.07 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | $4.43 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $4.59 Million | $8.50 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | $3.54 Million | $8.85 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2012 | 0.51x | $4.06 Million | $8.01 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2011 | 0.51x | $3.44 Million | $6.71 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $2.98 Million | $6.10 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2009 | 0.43x | $1.93 Million | $4.45 Million | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $1.65 Million | $5.56 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $4.61 Million | $7.53 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2006 | 0.80x | $5.97 Million | $7.49 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | $4.96 Million | $7.08 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2004 | 0.91x | $6.59 Million | $7.23 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2003 | 0.87x | $4.78 Million | $5.47 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2002 | 0.76x | $3.90 Million | $5.12 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2001 | 0.83x | $3.88 Million | $4.69 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2000 | 1.00x | $3.56 Million | $3.55 Million | ▲ +70.3% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $1.00 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 1998 | 0.50x | $1.40 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $1.20 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 1996 | 0.29x | $1.00 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +407.1% |
| 1995 | -0.09x | $-400.00K | $4.30 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1994 | -0.13x | $-400.00K | $3.00 Million | — |