Canterbury Park Holding Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.28 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($18.90 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation across 32 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.30x | $8.90 Million | $29.52 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $6.52 Million | $25.83 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | $11.54 Million | $22.88 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2022 | 0.53x | $11.22 Million | $21.09 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2021 | 0.72x | $13.50 Million | $18.71 Million | ▲ +653.5% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $1.68 Million | $17.51 Million | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2019 | 0.42x | $6.74 Million | $16.00 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2018 | 0.43x | $6.33 Million | $14.69 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2017 | 0.51x | $7.09 Million | $13.82 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2016 | 0.38x | $4.94 Million | $13.07 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | $4.43 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $4.59 Million | $8.50 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | $3.54 Million | $8.85 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2012 | 0.51x | $4.06 Million | $8.01 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2011 | 0.51x | $3.44 Million | $6.71 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $2.98 Million | $6.10 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2009 | 0.43x | $1.93 Million | $4.45 Million | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $1.65 Million | $5.56 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $4.61 Million | $7.53 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2006 | 0.80x | $5.97 Million | $7.49 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | $4.96 Million | $7.08 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2004 | 0.91x | $6.59 Million | $7.23 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2003 | 0.87x | $4.78 Million | $5.47 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2002 | 0.76x | $3.90 Million | $5.12 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2001 | 0.83x | $3.88 Million | $4.69 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2000 | 1.00x | $3.56 Million | $3.55 Million | ▲ +70.3% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $1.00 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 1998 | 0.50x | $1.40 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $1.20 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 1996 | 0.29x | $1.00 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +407.1% |
| 1995 | -0.09x | $-400.00K | $4.30 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1994 | -0.13x | $-400.00K | $3.00 Million | — |