Regis Corporation Common Stock (RGS) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Regis Corporation Common Stock (RGS) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.14x as of June 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($4.18 Million) in capital expenditures ($590.00K). Check Regis Corporation Common Stock (RGS) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Regis Corporation Common Stock Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1991–2026)
This chart tracks Regis Corporation Common Stock's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Regis Corporation Common Stock.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Regis Corporation Common Stock (1991–2026)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Regis Corporation Common Stock from 1991 to 2026. See how much free cash does Regis Corporation Common Stock generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.15x | $13.10 Million | $1.97 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2025 | 0.09x | $13.74 Million | $1.29 Million | ▼ -99.3% |
| 2018 | 13.21x | $2.33 Million | $30.74 Million | ▲ +2243.3% |
| 2017 | 0.56x | $60.05 Million | $33.84 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2016 | 0.57x | $55.03 Million | $31.12 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | $93.96 Million | $38.26 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2014 | 0.42x | $117.40 Million | $49.44 Million | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2013 | 1.53x | $69.15 Million | $105.86 Million | ▲ +166.3% |
| 2012 | 0.57x | $153.70 Million | $88.36 Million | ▲ +47.3% |
| 2011 | 0.39x | $229.18 Million | $89.46 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2010 | 0.32x | $192.22 Million | $61.48 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2009 | 0.39x | $188.06 Million | $73.57 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2008 | 0.39x | $222.38 Million | $85.80 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2007 | 0.37x | $241.86 Million | $90.08 Million | ▼ -12.5% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $281.69 Million | $119.91 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2005 | 0.47x | $215.73 Million | $101.10 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | $205.66 Million | $74.08 Million | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $149.62 Million | $77.46 Million | ▲ +18.8% |
| 2002 | 0.44x | $152.04 Million | $66.23 Million | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2001 | 1.14x | $110.31 Million | $125.39 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2000 | 1.73x | $85.38 Million | $147.73 Million | ▲ +6.5% |
| 1999 | 1.62x | $72.20 Million | $117.30 Million | ▲ +36.8% |
| 1998 | 1.19x | $67.70 Million | $80.40 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 1997 | 1.13x | $34.90 Million | $39.40 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 1996 | 0.71x | $36.90 Million | $26.10 Million | ▲ +41.9% |
| 1995 | 0.50x | $30.70 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 1994 | 0.68x | $23.10 Million | $15.80 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 1993 | 1.02x | $18.90 Million | $19.30 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 1992 | 2.00x | $6.60 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +75.4% |
| 1991 | 1.14x | $12.10 Million | $13.80 Million | — |