Gibraltar Industries Inc (ROCK) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Gibraltar Industries Inc (ROCK) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 1.38x as of June 2026, meaning it reinvests 1% of its operating cash flow ($3.77 Million) in capital expenditures ($5.20 Million). Check Gibraltar Industries Inc tangible book value ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Gibraltar Industries Inc Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1993–2025)
This chart tracks Gibraltar Industries Inc's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Gibraltar Industries Inc generate cash.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Gibraltar Industries Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Gibraltar Industries Inc from 1993 to 2025. See ROCK free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | $167.00 Million | $46.13 Million | ▲ +141.5% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $174.26 Million | $19.93 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $218.48 Million | $13.91 Million | ▼ -67.4% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $102.69 Million | $20.06 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2021 | 0.77x | $23.07 Million | $17.70 Million | ▲ +423.3% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $89.10 Million | $13.07 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $129.94 Million | $11.18 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $97.55 Million | $12.46 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $70.07 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +85.2% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $122.74 Million | $10.78 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $86.68 Million | $12.37 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 2014 | 0.72x | $32.54 Million | $23.29 Million | ▲ +188.9% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | $60.30 Million | $14.94 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $50.08 Million | $11.35 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $46.70 Million | $11.55 Million | ▲ +102.2% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $69.24 Million | $8.47 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $131.60 Million | $10.81 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $107.87 Million | $21.59 Million | ▲ +69.5% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $158.81 Million | $18.75 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $131.00 Million | $22.12 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2003 | 0.35x | $64.66 Million | $22.57 Million | ▼ -73.4% |
| 2002 | 1.31x | $12.21 Million | $15.99 Million | ▲ +592.7% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $75.82 Million | $14.34 Million | ▼ -67.1% |
| 2000 | 0.58x | $34.12 Million | $19.62 Million | ▲ +58.6% |
| 1999 | 0.36x | $60.67 Million | $22.00 Million | ▼ -96.0% |
| 1998 | 9.14x | $13.30 Million | $121.50 Million | ▲ +922.5% |
| 1997 | 0.89x | $24.40 Million | $21.80 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 1996 | 1.14x | $13.60 Million | $15.50 Million | ▲ +180.6% |
| 1995 | 0.41x | $35.70 Million | $14.50 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 1993 | 1.04x | $10.10 Million | $10.50 Million | — |