Shoe Station Group Inc. (SHOE) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Shoe Station Group Inc. (SHOE) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.45x as of April 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($23.08 Million) in capital expenditures ($10.44 Million). Check SHOE tangible net assets ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Shoe Station Group Inc. Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1993–2026)
This chart tracks Shoe Station Group Inc.'s Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SHOE cash generation efficiency.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Shoe Station Group Inc. (1993–2026)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Shoe Station Group Inc. from 1993 to 2026. See SHOE free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.63x | $71.30 Million | $44.72 Million | ▲ +94.1% |
| 2025 | 0.32x | $102.64 Million | $33.16 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2024 | 0.46x | $122.76 Million | $56.28 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2023 | 1.53x | $50.44 Million | $77.29 Million | ▲ +622.1% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $147.89 Million | $31.39 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $63.40 Million | $12.40 Million | ▼ -29.2% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | $66.95 Million | $18.50 Million | ▲ +176.4% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $74.14 Million | $7.41 Million | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2018 | 0.49x | $40.35 Million | $19.65 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | $63.79 Million | $21.83 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2016 | 0.48x | $58.55 Million | $27.90 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2015 | 0.58x | $57.65 Million | $33.54 Million | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2014 | 0.80x | $38.62 Million | $30.97 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2013 | 1.00x | $25.85 Million | $25.98 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2012 | 0.69x | $30.88 Million | $21.26 Million | ▲ +40.6% |
| 2011 | 0.49x | $29.42 Million | $14.41 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $27.90 Million | $9.79 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2009 | 0.57x | $32.08 Million | $18.20 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 2008 | 0.93x | $19.88 Million | $18.43 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | $29.27 Million | $24.95 Million | ▲ +94.7% |
| 2006 | 0.44x | $33.69 Million | $14.75 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2005 | 0.49x | $29.13 Million | $14.21 Million | ▼ -81.3% |
| 2004 | 2.61x | $7.86 Million | $20.55 Million | ▲ +278.6% |
| 2003 | 0.69x | $27.72 Million | $19.14 Million | ▲ +48.4% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | $22.33 Million | $10.39 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2001 | 4.51x | $3.11 Million | $14.03 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 2000 | 57.68x | $355.00K | $20.48 Million | ▲ +7509.4% |
| 1999 | 0.76x | $18.60 Million | $14.10 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 1998 | 0.71x | $10.60 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +86.4% |
| 1997 | 0.38x | $16.60 Million | $6.30 Million | ▼ -44.9% |
| 1996 | 0.69x | $7.40 Million | $5.10 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 1993 | 0.91x | $2.30 Million | $2.10 Million | — |