Shoe Station Group Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Shoe Station Group Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Shoe Station Group Inc. (SHOE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $23.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($485.68 Million) in one year. Check Shoe Station Group Inc. cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Shoe Station Group Inc. (1993–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Shoe Station Group Inc. from 1993 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Shoe Station Group Inc. across 34 annual periods. Check Shoe Station Group Inc. cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Shoe Station Group Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2026)
Shoe Station Group Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shoe Station Group Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SHOE operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.14x | $71.30 Million | $512.08 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2025 | 0.22x | $102.64 Million | $475.14 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $122.76 Million | $458.64 Million | ▲ +146.3% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $50.44 Million | $464.21 Million | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2022 | 0.41x | $147.89 Million | $359.73 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $63.40 Million | $332.57 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $66.95 Million | $331.01 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2019 | 0.65x | $74.14 Million | $113.57 Million | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2018 | 0.37x | $40.35 Million | $108.28 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2017 | 0.46x | $63.79 Million | $139.60 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | $58.55 Million | $141.29 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2015 | 0.43x | $57.65 Million | $133.82 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | $38.62 Million | $119.98 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $25.85 Million | $114.83 Million | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2012 | 0.30x | $30.88 Million | $102.88 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | $29.42 Million | $90.80 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $27.90 Million | $89.81 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $32.08 Million | $88.44 Million | ▲ +73.3% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $19.88 Million | $95.00 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $29.27 Million | $101.21 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2006 | 0.36x | $33.69 Million | $93.68 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $29.13 Million | $99.99 Million | ▲ +282.4% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $7.86 Million | $103.17 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 2003 | 0.31x | $27.72 Million | $88.38 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | $22.33 Million | $89.82 Million | ▲ +627.8% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $3.11 Million | $91.04 Million | ▲ +568.9% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $355.00K | $69.51 Million | ▼ -99.0% |
| 1999 | 0.49x | $18.60 Million | $38.10 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1998 | 0.44x | $10.60 Million | $24.00 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1997 | 0.55x | $16.60 Million | $30.10 Million | ▲ +218.2% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $7.40 Million | $42.70 Million | ▲ +146.9% |
| 1995 | -0.37x | $-13.90 Million | $37.60 Million | ▲ +57.2% |
| 1994 | -0.86x | $-11.50 Million | $13.30 Million | ▼ -1472.2% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $2.30 Million | $36.50 Million | — |