Shoe Station Group Inc. (SHOE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Shoe Station Group Inc. (SHOE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $23.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($485.68 Million) in one year. See Shoe Station Group Inc. (SHOE) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Shoe Station Group Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Shoe Station Group Inc. across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Shoe Station Group Inc..
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Shoe Station Group Inc. (1993–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shoe Station Group Inc.. Check earnings quality score of Shoe Station Group Inc. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.14x | $71.30 Million | $512.08 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2025 | 0.22x | $102.64 Million | $475.14 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $122.76 Million | $458.64 Million | ▲ +146.3% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $50.44 Million | $464.21 Million | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2022 | 0.41x | $147.89 Million | $359.73 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $63.40 Million | $332.57 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $66.95 Million | $331.01 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2019 | 0.65x | $74.14 Million | $113.57 Million | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2018 | 0.37x | $40.35 Million | $108.28 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2017 | 0.46x | $63.79 Million | $139.60 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | $58.55 Million | $141.29 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2015 | 0.43x | $57.65 Million | $133.82 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | $38.62 Million | $119.98 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $25.85 Million | $114.83 Million | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2012 | 0.30x | $30.88 Million | $102.88 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | $29.42 Million | $90.80 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $27.90 Million | $89.81 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $32.08 Million | $88.44 Million | ▲ +73.3% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $19.88 Million | $95.00 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $29.27 Million | $101.21 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2006 | 0.36x | $33.69 Million | $93.68 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $29.13 Million | $99.99 Million | ▲ +282.4% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $7.86 Million | $103.17 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 2003 | 0.31x | $27.72 Million | $88.38 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | $22.33 Million | $89.82 Million | ▲ +627.8% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $3.11 Million | $91.04 Million | ▲ +568.9% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $355.00K | $69.51 Million | ▼ -99.0% |
| 1999 | 0.49x | $18.60 Million | $38.10 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1998 | 0.44x | $10.60 Million | $24.00 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1997 | 0.55x | $16.60 Million | $30.10 Million | ▲ +218.2% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $7.40 Million | $42.70 Million | ▲ +146.9% |
| 1995 | -0.37x | $-13.90 Million | $37.60 Million | ▲ +57.2% |
| 1994 | -0.86x | $-11.50 Million | $13.30 Million | ▼ -1472.2% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $2.30 Million | $36.50 Million | — |