Shoe Station Group Inc. (SHOE) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Shoe Station Group Inc. (SHOE) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 3.76x as of January 2026. Operating cash flow of $34.04 Million exceeds net income of $9.05 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore cash flow to debt ratio of Shoe Station Group Inc. to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Shoe Station Group Inc. Cash Flow Quality Index (1993–2026)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Shoe Station Group Inc. across 33 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Shoe Station Group Inc. (SHOE) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Shoe Station Group Inc. (1993–2026)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Shoe Station Group Inc..
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.36x | $71.30 Million | $52.27 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2025 | 1.39x | $102.64 Million | $73.77 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2024 | 1.67x | $122.76 Million | $73.35 Million | ▲ +265.2% |
| 2023 | 0.46x | $50.44 Million | $110.07 Million | ▼ -52.0% |
| 2022 | 0.95x | $147.89 Million | $154.88 Million | ▼ -75.9% |
| 2021 | 3.96x | $63.40 Million | $15.99 Million | ▲ +154.1% |
| 2020 | 1.56x | $66.95 Million | $42.91 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2019 | 1.94x | $74.14 Million | $38.13 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2018 | 2.13x | $40.35 Million | $18.93 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2017 | 2.71x | $63.79 Million | $23.52 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2016 | 2.04x | $58.55 Million | $28.77 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2015 | 2.26x | $57.65 Million | $25.53 Million | ▲ +57.1% |
| 2014 | 1.44x | $38.62 Million | $26.87 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2013 | 0.88x | $25.85 Million | $29.34 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2012 | 1.17x | $30.88 Million | $26.38 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2011 | 1.10x | $29.42 Million | $26.82 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2010 | 1.84x | $27.90 Million | $15.17 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2009 | 6.03x | $32.08 Million | $5.32 Million | ▲ +288.5% |
| 2008 | 1.55x | $19.88 Million | $12.81 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2007 | 1.23x | $29.27 Million | $23.76 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2006 | 1.79x | $33.69 Million | $18.79 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2005 | 2.33x | $29.13 Million | $12.53 Million | ▲ +261.9% |
| 2004 | 0.64x | $7.86 Million | $12.23 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2003 | 1.75x | $27.72 Million | $15.84 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2002 | 1.78x | $22.33 Million | $12.57 Million | ▲ +455.2% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | $3.11 Million | $9.72 Million | ▲ +977.7% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $355.00K | $11.96 Million | ▼ -98.4% |
| 1999 | 1.82x | $18.60 Million | $10.20 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 1998 | 1.43x | $10.60 Million | $7.40 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 1997 | 4.05x | $16.60 Million | $4.10 Million | ▲ +135.0% |
| 1995 | -11.58x | $-13.90 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -494.3% |
| 1994 | -1.95x | $-11.50 Million | $5.90 Million | ▼ -481.4% |
| 1993 | 0.51x | $2.30 Million | $4.50 Million | — |