Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 1.77x as of March 2026, meaning it reinvests 2% of its operating cash flow ($10.21 Million) in capital expenditures ($18.06 Million). See net asset quality index of Brandywine Realty Trust to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Brandywine Realty Trust Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1995–2025)
This chart tracks Brandywine Realty Trust's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Brandywine Realty Trust to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Brandywine Realty Trust (1995–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Brandywine Realty Trust from 1995 to 2025. For live market cap and broader valuation context, see how much is Brandywine Realty Trust worth.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.63x | $116.70 Million | $74.00 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2024 | 0.72x | $181.12 Million | $129.76 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2023 | 0.88x | $177.27 Million | $156.46 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2022 | 1.26x | $209.31 Million | $263.01 Million | ▲ +77.5% |
| 2021 | 0.71x | $190.87 Million | $135.12 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2020 | 0.71x | $225.81 Million | $160.25 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2019 | 0.85x | $234.23 Million | $198.30 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2018 | 0.94x | $227.35 Million | $212.60 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2017 | 0.89x | $182.02 Million | $162.18 Million | ▼ -39.7% |
| 2016 | 1.48x | $172.22 Million | $254.49 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2015 | 1.67x | $195.10 Million | $326.14 Million | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2014 | 1.25x | $189.00 Million | $236.93 Million | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2013 | 0.66x | $183.48 Million | $121.11 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2012 | 0.63x | $157.28 Million | $99.11 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2011 | 0.96x | $179.01 Million | $171.83 Million | ▼ -23.3% |
| 2010 | 1.25x | $185.13 Million | $231.62 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2009 | 1.06x | $220.41 Million | $233.32 Million | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2008 | 0.76x | $231.33 Million | $175.62 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2007 | 2.03x | $219.82 Million | $446.68 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2006 | 2.92x | $241.57 Million | $706.51 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2005 | 2.16x | $125.15 Million | $269.98 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2004 | 4.58x | $153.18 Million | $701.57 Million | ▲ +357.6% |
| 2003 | 1.00x | $118.79 Million | $118.90 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2002 | 0.76x | $118.68 Million | $89.97 Million | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2001 | 1.37x | $141.37 Million | $193.11 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2000 | 1.30x | $102.24 Million | $132.65 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 1999 | 1.24x | $88.51 Million | $109.59 Million | ▼ -95.2% |
| 1998 | 25.90x | $69.24 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +110.9% |
| 1997 | 12.28x | $33.57 Million | $412.35 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 1996 | 13.36x | $2.54 Million | $33.89 Million | ▲ +848.7% |
| 1995 | 1.41x | $497.00K | $700.00K | — |