Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.36x as of June 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($41.64 Million) in capital expenditures ($15.10 Million). Check BDN goodwill-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Brandywine Realty Trust Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1995–2025)
This chart tracks Brandywine Realty Trust's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BDN operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Brandywine Realty Trust (1995–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Brandywine Realty Trust from 1995 to 2025. See BDN FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.97x | $116.70 Million | $113.40 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2024 | 0.72x | $181.12 Million | $129.76 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2023 | 0.88x | $177.27 Million | $156.46 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2022 | 1.26x | $209.31 Million | $263.01 Million | ▲ +77.5% |
| 2021 | 0.71x | $190.87 Million | $135.12 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2020 | 0.71x | $225.81 Million | $160.25 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2019 | 0.85x | $234.23 Million | $198.30 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2018 | 0.94x | $227.35 Million | $212.60 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2017 | 0.89x | $182.02 Million | $162.18 Million | ▼ -39.7% |
| 2016 | 1.48x | $172.22 Million | $254.49 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2015 | 1.67x | $195.10 Million | $326.14 Million | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2014 | 1.25x | $189.00 Million | $236.93 Million | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2013 | 0.66x | $183.48 Million | $121.11 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2012 | 0.63x | $157.28 Million | $99.11 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2011 | 0.96x | $179.01 Million | $171.83 Million | ▼ -23.3% |
| 2010 | 1.25x | $185.13 Million | $231.62 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2009 | 1.06x | $220.41 Million | $233.32 Million | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2008 | 0.76x | $231.33 Million | $175.62 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2007 | 2.03x | $219.82 Million | $446.68 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2006 | 2.92x | $241.57 Million | $706.51 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2005 | 2.16x | $125.15 Million | $269.98 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2004 | 4.58x | $153.18 Million | $701.57 Million | ▲ +357.6% |
| 2003 | 1.00x | $118.79 Million | $118.90 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2002 | 0.76x | $118.68 Million | $89.97 Million | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2001 | 1.37x | $141.37 Million | $193.11 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2000 | 1.30x | $102.24 Million | $132.65 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 1999 | 1.24x | $88.51 Million | $109.59 Million | ▼ -95.2% |
| 1998 | 25.90x | $69.24 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +110.9% |
| 1997 | 12.28x | $33.57 Million | $412.35 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 1996 | 13.36x | $2.54 Million | $33.89 Million | ▲ +848.7% |
| 1995 | 1.41x | $497.00K | $700.00K | — |