Brandywine Realty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Brandywine Realty Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio. Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $41.64 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.84 Billion) in one year. Check how aggressively does Brandywine Realty Trust reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Brandywine Realty Trust (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Brandywine Realty Trust from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Brandywine Realty Trust across 32 annual periods. Check Brandywine Realty Trust cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Brandywine Realty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Brandywine Realty Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Brandywine Realty Trust. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Brandywine Realty Trust.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $116.70 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -43.4% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $181.12 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $177.27 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $209.31 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $190.87 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $225.81 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $234.23 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $227.35 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $182.02 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $172.22 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $195.10 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $189.00 Million | $2.70 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $183.48 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $157.28 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $179.01 Million | $2.67 Billion | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $185.13 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $220.41 Million | $2.74 Billion | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $231.33 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $219.82 Million | $3.39 Billion | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $241.57 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $125.15 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $153.18 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $118.79 Million | $950.43 Million | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $118.68 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $141.37 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $102.24 Million | $923.96 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $88.51 Million | $989.92 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $69.24 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -65.3% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $33.57 Million | $181.58 Million | ▲ +410.4% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $2.54 Million | $70.00 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $497.00K | $9.76 Million | ▲ +173.8% |
| 1994 | -0.07x | $-600.00K | $8.70 Million | — |