Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.85 Billion) in one year. Explore Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Brandywine Realty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Brandywine Realty Trust across 32 annual periods. Also explore BDN total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Brandywine Realty Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Brandywine Realty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Brandywine Realty Trust market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $116.70 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -43.4% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $181.12 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $177.27 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $209.31 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $190.87 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $225.81 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $234.23 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $227.35 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $182.02 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $172.22 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $195.10 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $189.00 Million | $2.70 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $183.48 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $157.28 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $179.01 Million | $2.67 Billion | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $185.13 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $220.41 Million | $2.74 Billion | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $231.33 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $219.82 Million | $3.39 Billion | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $241.57 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $125.15 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $153.18 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $118.79 Million | $950.43 Million | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $118.68 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $141.37 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $102.24 Million | $923.96 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $88.51 Million | $989.92 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $69.24 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -65.3% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $33.57 Million | $181.58 Million | ▲ +410.4% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $2.54 Million | $70.00 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $497.00K | $9.76 Million | ▲ +173.8% |
| 1994 | -0.07x | $-600.00K | $8.70 Million | — |