Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.85 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Brandywine Realty Trust to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Brandywine Realty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Brandywine Realty Trust across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Brandywine Realty Trust to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Brandywine Realty Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Brandywine Realty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $116.70 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -43.4% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $181.12 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $177.27 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $209.31 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $190.87 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $225.81 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $234.23 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $227.35 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $182.02 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $172.22 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $195.10 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $189.00 Million | $2.70 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $183.48 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $157.28 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $179.01 Million | $2.67 Billion | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $185.13 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $220.41 Million | $2.74 Billion | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $231.33 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $219.82 Million | $3.39 Billion | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $241.57 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $125.15 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $153.18 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $118.79 Million | $950.43 Million | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $118.68 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $141.37 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $102.24 Million | $923.96 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $88.51 Million | $989.92 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $69.24 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -65.3% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $33.57 Million | $181.58 Million | ▲ +410.4% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $2.54 Million | $70.00 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $497.00K | $9.76 Million | ▲ +173.8% |
| 1994 | -0.07x | $-600.00K | $8.70 Million | — |