Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 1.25x as of June 2026, meaning it reinvests 1% of its operating cash flow ($213.60 Million) in capital expenditures ($266.90 Million). Check Chesapeake Utilities Corporation tangible equity quality to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1994–2025)
This chart tracks Chesapeake Utilities Corporation's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CPK cash flow conversion.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation from 1994 to 2025. See cash generation quality of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.92x | $233.70 Million | $448.60 Million | ▲ +29.3% |
| 2024 | 1.48x | $239.40 Million | $355.30 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2023 | 0.93x | $203.48 Million | $188.62 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2022 | 0.81x | $158.88 Million | $128.28 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2021 | 1.24x | $150.50 Million | $186.92 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2020 | 1.04x | $158.92 Million | $165.51 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2019 | 1.79x | $102.96 Million | $184.73 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2018 | 1.84x | $146.78 Million | $269.77 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2017 | 1.59x | $110.09 Million | $175.33 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2016 | 1.64x | $103.37 Million | $169.86 Million | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2015 | 1.38x | $105.14 Million | $144.62 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2014 | 1.23x | $79.28 Million | $97.16 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2013 | 1.33x | $72.93 Million | $97.12 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2012 | 1.09x | $65.87 Million | $72.01 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2011 | 0.67x | $71.12 Million | $47.68 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2010 | 0.75x | $61.01 Million | $45.70 Million | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2009 | 0.59x | $45.81 Million | $27.02 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2008 | 1.08x | $28.54 Million | $30.76 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2007 | 1.22x | $25.68 Million | $31.28 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2006 | 1.62x | $30.12 Million | $48.85 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2005 | 2.48x | $13.29 Million | $33.01 Million | ▲ +227.3% |
| 2004 | 0.76x | $23.46 Million | $17.81 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2003 | 0.54x | $21.98 Million | $11.79 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2002 | 0.60x | $24.39 Million | $14.71 Million | ▼ -68.1% |
| 2001 | 1.89x | $15.45 Million | $29.19 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2000 | 2.61x | $8.37 Million | $21.82 Million | ▲ +72.5% |
| 1999 | 1.51x | $16.60 Million | $25.10 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 1998 | 1.09x | $11.00 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1997 | 1.01x | $12.30 Million | $12.40 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 1996 | 1.24x | $11.30 Million | $14.00 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 1995 | 0.90x | $13.00 Million | $11.70 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 1994 | 0.73x | $14.40 Million | $10.50 Million | — |