Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $213.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.50 Billion) in one year. See CPK FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation. Check CPK cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $233.70 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $239.40 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $203.48 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $158.88 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $150.50 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $158.92 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $102.96 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $146.78 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $110.09 Million | $931.14 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $103.37 Million | $783.13 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $105.14 Million | $710.45 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $79.28 Million | $604.15 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $72.93 Million | $558.75 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $65.87 Million | $477.15 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $71.12 Million | $468.29 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $61.01 Million | $444.75 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $45.81 Million | $407.32 Million | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $28.54 Million | $262.72 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $25.68 Million | $261.98 Million | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $30.12 Million | $213.84 Million | ▲ +123.9% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $13.29 Million | $211.22 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $23.46 Million | $163.98 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $21.98 Million | $148.23 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $24.39 Million | $144.25 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $15.45 Million | $143.28 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $8.37 Million | $146.73 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $16.60 Million | $106.80 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $11.00 Million | $88.80 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $12.30 Million | $87.10 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $11.30 Million | $83.90 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $13.00 Million | $76.50 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $14.40 Million | $71.20 Million | — |