Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $118.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.44 Billion) in one year. Explore Chesapeake Utilities Corporation long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore Chesapeake Utilities Corporation assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $233.70 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $239.40 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $203.48 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $158.88 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $150.50 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $158.92 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $102.96 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $146.78 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $110.09 Million | $931.14 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $103.37 Million | $783.13 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $105.14 Million | $710.45 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $79.28 Million | $604.15 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $72.93 Million | $558.75 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $65.87 Million | $477.15 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $71.12 Million | $468.29 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $61.01 Million | $444.75 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $45.81 Million | $407.32 Million | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $28.54 Million | $262.72 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $25.68 Million | $261.98 Million | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $30.12 Million | $213.84 Million | ▲ +123.9% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $13.29 Million | $211.22 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $23.46 Million | $163.98 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $21.98 Million | $148.23 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $24.39 Million | $144.25 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $15.45 Million | $143.28 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $8.37 Million | $146.73 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $16.60 Million | $106.80 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $11.00 Million | $88.80 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $12.30 Million | $87.10 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $11.30 Million | $83.90 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $13.00 Million | $76.50 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $14.40 Million | $71.20 Million | — |