Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $118.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.44 Billion) in one year. See CPK free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CPK market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $233.70 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $239.40 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $203.48 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $158.88 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $150.50 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $158.92 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $102.96 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $146.78 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $110.09 Million | $931.14 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $103.37 Million | $783.13 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $105.14 Million | $710.45 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $79.28 Million | $604.15 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $72.93 Million | $558.75 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $65.87 Million | $477.15 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $71.12 Million | $468.29 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $61.01 Million | $444.75 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $45.81 Million | $407.32 Million | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $28.54 Million | $262.72 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $25.68 Million | $261.98 Million | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $30.12 Million | $213.84 Million | ▲ +123.9% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $13.29 Million | $211.22 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $23.46 Million | $163.98 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $21.98 Million | $148.23 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $24.39 Million | $144.25 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $15.45 Million | $143.28 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $8.37 Million | $146.73 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $16.60 Million | $106.80 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $11.00 Million | $88.80 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $12.30 Million | $87.10 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $11.30 Million | $83.90 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $13.00 Million | $76.50 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $14.40 Million | $71.20 Million | — |