Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.18x as of March 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($31.70 Million) in capital expenditures ($5.60 Million). Check Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1989–2025)
This chart tracks Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) cash flow conversion.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (1989–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated from 1989 to 2025. See cash generation quality of Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $300.70 Million | $37.40 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $149.20 Million | $17.40 Million | ▼ -72.0% |
| 2021 | 0.42x | $123.30 Million | $51.30 Million | ▼ -83.2% |
| 2020 | 2.48x | $18.00 Million | $44.70 Million | ▲ +686.1% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | $135.80 Million | $42.90 Million | ▼ -88.6% |
| 2017 | 2.76x | $37.10 Million | $102.50 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2016 | 2.38x | $28.40 Million | $67.70 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2015 | 1.60x | $36.70 Million | $58.60 Million | ▲ +385.6% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | $186.91 Million | $61.45 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $124.22 Million | $35.45 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $135.51 Million | $49.74 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $215.40 Million | $54.75 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | $273.35 Million | $51.30 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $300.85 Million | $44.29 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $281.15 Million | $57.93 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $281.15 Million | $57.93 Million | ▲ +16.5% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | $250.42 Million | $44.28 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | $116.86 Million | $62.60 Million | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | $232.65 Million | $61.24 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2003 | 0.35x | $209.90 Million | $72.82 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2002 | 0.31x | $163.50 Million | $50.34 Million | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2001 | 0.44x | $154.36 Million | $68.66 Million | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2000 | 0.29x | $146.19 Million | $42.69 Million | ▼ -72.4% |
| 1999 | 1.06x | $188.60 Million | $199.40 Million | ▲ +508.3% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $177.20 Million | $30.80 Million | ▼ -71.4% |
| 1997 | 0.61x | $111.30 Million | $67.70 Million | ▲ +69.4% |
| 1996 | 0.36x | $93.60 Million | $33.60 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 1995 | 0.50x | $71.20 Million | $35.30 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 1994 | 0.55x | $41.30 Million | $22.60 Million | ▲ +182.9% |
| 1993 | 0.19x | $94.60 Million | $18.30 Million | ▲ +39.4% |
| 1992 | 0.14x | $86.50 Million | $12.00 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 1991 | 0.19x | $48.40 Million | $9.10 Million | ▼ -56.7% |
| 1990 | 0.43x | $51.10 Million | $22.20 Million | ▲ +191.8% |
| 1989 | 0.15x | $66.50 Million | $9.90 Million | — |