Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $31.70 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.80 Billion) in one year. Explore Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated across 37 annual periods. Also explore DBD total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see DBD market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $300.70 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $149.20 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +168.7% |
| 2023 | -0.08x | $-257.00 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-387.90 Million | $4.44 Billion | ▼ -408.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $123.30 Million | $4.34 Billion | ▲ +604.8% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $18.00 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▼ -87.3% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $135.80 Million | $4.28 Billion | ▲ +232.4% |
| 2018 | -0.02x | $-104.10 Million | $4.34 Billion | ▼ -374.5% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $37.10 Million | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $28.40 Million | $4.20 Billion | ▼ -66.7% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $36.70 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▼ -80.6% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $186.91 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $124.22 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $135.51 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $215.40 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $273.35 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $300.85 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +13.6% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $281.15 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $281.15 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | $250.42 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $116.86 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $232.65 Million | $849.54 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $209.90 Million | $731.91 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $163.50 Million | $669.93 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $154.36 Million | $739.42 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | $146.19 Million | $644.10 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1999 | 0.42x | $188.60 Million | $450.00 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 1998 | 0.59x | $177.20 Million | $301.40 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 1997 | 0.36x | $111.30 Million | $305.60 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $93.60 Million | $270.40 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 1995 | 0.32x | $71.20 Million | $225.20 Million | ▲ +43.7% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $41.30 Million | $187.70 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 1993 | 0.56x | $94.60 Million | $170.40 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 1992 | 0.58x | $86.50 Million | $148.50 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 1991 | 0.37x | $48.40 Million | $131.40 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 1990 | 0.38x | $51.10 Million | $134.80 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 1989 | 0.60x | $66.50 Million | $110.10 Million | — |