Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $31.70 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.80 Billion) in one year. See Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated across 37 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $300.70 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $149.20 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +168.7% |
| 2023 | -0.08x | $-257.00 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-387.90 Million | $4.44 Billion | ▼ -408.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $123.30 Million | $4.34 Billion | ▲ +604.8% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $18.00 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▼ -87.3% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $135.80 Million | $4.28 Billion | ▲ +232.4% |
| 2018 | -0.02x | $-104.10 Million | $4.34 Billion | ▼ -374.5% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $37.10 Million | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $28.40 Million | $4.20 Billion | ▼ -66.7% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $36.70 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▼ -80.6% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $186.91 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $124.22 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $135.51 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $215.40 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $273.35 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $300.85 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +13.6% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $281.15 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $281.15 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | $250.42 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $116.86 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $232.65 Million | $849.54 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $209.90 Million | $731.91 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $163.50 Million | $669.93 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $154.36 Million | $739.42 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | $146.19 Million | $644.10 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1999 | 0.42x | $188.60 Million | $450.00 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 1998 | 0.59x | $177.20 Million | $301.40 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 1997 | 0.36x | $111.30 Million | $305.60 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $93.60 Million | $270.40 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 1995 | 0.32x | $71.20 Million | $225.20 Million | ▲ +43.7% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $41.30 Million | $187.70 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 1993 | 0.56x | $94.60 Million | $170.40 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 1992 | 0.58x | $86.50 Million | $148.50 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 1991 | 0.37x | $48.40 Million | $131.40 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 1990 | 0.38x | $51.10 Million | $134.80 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 1989 | 0.60x | $66.50 Million | $110.10 Million | — |