Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-20.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.76 Billion) in one year. See DBD financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated. Check DBD operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $300.70 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $149.20 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +168.7% |
| 2023 | -0.08x | $-257.00 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-387.90 Million | $4.44 Billion | ▼ -408.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $123.30 Million | $4.34 Billion | ▲ +604.8% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $18.00 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▼ -87.3% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $135.80 Million | $4.28 Billion | ▲ +232.4% |
| 2018 | -0.02x | $-104.10 Million | $4.34 Billion | ▼ -374.5% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $37.10 Million | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $28.40 Million | $4.20 Billion | ▼ -66.7% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $36.70 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▼ -80.6% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $186.91 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $124.22 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $135.51 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $215.40 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $273.35 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $300.85 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +13.6% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $281.15 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $281.15 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | $250.42 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $116.86 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $232.65 Million | $849.54 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $209.90 Million | $731.91 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $163.50 Million | $669.93 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $154.36 Million | $739.42 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | $146.19 Million | $644.10 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1999 | 0.42x | $188.60 Million | $450.00 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 1998 | 0.59x | $177.20 Million | $301.40 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 1997 | 0.36x | $111.30 Million | $305.60 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $93.60 Million | $270.40 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 1995 | 0.32x | $71.20 Million | $225.20 Million | ▲ +43.7% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $41.30 Million | $187.70 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 1993 | 0.56x | $94.60 Million | $170.40 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 1992 | 0.58x | $86.50 Million | $148.50 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 1991 | 0.37x | $48.40 Million | $131.40 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 1990 | 0.38x | $51.10 Million | $134.80 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 1989 | 0.60x | $66.50 Million | $110.10 Million | — |