Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.59x as of December 2025, meaning it reinvests 1% of its operating cash flow ($19.30 Million) in capital expenditures ($11.30 Million). See MATV net asset quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Mativ Holdings Inc. Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1995–2025)
This chart tracks Mativ Holdings Inc.'s Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Mativ Holdings Inc. to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Mativ Holdings Inc. (1995–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Mativ Holdings Inc. from 1995 to 2025. For live market cap and broader valuation context, see how much is Mativ Holdings Inc. worth.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.30x | $133.80 Million | $40.00 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2024 | 0.59x | $94.80 Million | $55.60 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2023 | 0.62x | $106.60 Million | $66.40 Million | ▲ +111.3% |
| 2022 | 0.29x | $202.20 Million | $59.60 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2021 | 0.67x | $58.10 Million | $38.90 Million | ▲ +224.9% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $161.60 Million | $33.30 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $160.30 Million | $34.10 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $139.10 Million | $29.70 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2017 | 0.31x | $131.00 Million | $40.70 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | $129.70 Million | $30.60 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $144.70 Million | $25.10 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $165.90 Million | $36.10 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $178.10 Million | $29.60 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $171.60 Million | $28.10 Million | ▼ -78.5% |
| 2011 | 0.76x | $81.50 Million | $62.20 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2010 | 0.59x | $141.10 Million | $83.00 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $63.40 Million | $20.80 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2008 | 1.25x | $33.30 Million | $41.70 Million | ▲ +57.7% |
| 2007 | 0.79x | $71.30 Million | $56.60 Million | ▲ +206.9% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $51.80 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2005 | 0.49x | $38.10 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $57.30 Million | $46.70 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2003 | 1.42x | $64.80 Million | $92.00 Million | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | $63.90 Million | $30.30 Million | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2001 | 0.69x | $106.80 Million | $73.80 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 2000 | 0.41x | $71.70 Million | $29.40 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 1999 | 0.43x | $60.70 Million | $26.30 Million | ▼ -71.5% |
| 1998 | 1.52x | $67.10 Million | $102.10 Million | ▲ +186.0% |
| 1997 | 0.53x | $67.30 Million | $35.80 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1996 | 0.57x | $90.40 Million | $51.50 Million | ▲ +64.3% |
| 1995 | 0.35x | $64.90 Million | $22.50 Million | — |