Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.59x as of December 2025, meaning it reinvests 1% of its operating cash flow ($19.30 Million) in capital expenditures ($11.30 Million). Check Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) tangible net worth to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Mativ Holdings Inc. Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1995–2025)
This chart tracks Mativ Holdings Inc.'s Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mativ Holdings Inc. cash conversion from operations.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Mativ Holdings Inc. (1995–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Mativ Holdings Inc. from 1995 to 2025. See Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.30x | $133.80 Million | $40.00 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2024 | 0.59x | $94.80 Million | $55.60 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2023 | 0.62x | $106.60 Million | $66.40 Million | ▲ +111.3% |
| 2022 | 0.29x | $202.20 Million | $59.60 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2021 | 0.67x | $58.10 Million | $38.90 Million | ▲ +224.9% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $161.60 Million | $33.30 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $160.30 Million | $34.10 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $139.10 Million | $29.70 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2017 | 0.31x | $131.00 Million | $40.70 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | $129.70 Million | $30.60 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $144.70 Million | $25.10 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $165.90 Million | $36.10 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $178.10 Million | $29.60 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $171.60 Million | $28.10 Million | ▼ -78.5% |
| 2011 | 0.76x | $81.50 Million | $62.20 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2010 | 0.59x | $141.10 Million | $83.00 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $63.40 Million | $20.80 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2008 | 1.25x | $33.30 Million | $41.70 Million | ▲ +57.7% |
| 2007 | 0.79x | $71.30 Million | $56.60 Million | ▲ +206.9% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $51.80 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2005 | 0.49x | $38.10 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $57.30 Million | $46.70 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2003 | 1.42x | $64.80 Million | $92.00 Million | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | $63.90 Million | $30.30 Million | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2001 | 0.69x | $106.80 Million | $73.80 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 2000 | 0.41x | $71.70 Million | $29.40 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 1999 | 0.43x | $60.70 Million | $26.30 Million | ▼ -71.5% |
| 1998 | 1.52x | $67.10 Million | $102.10 Million | ▲ +186.0% |
| 1997 | 0.53x | $67.30 Million | $35.80 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1996 | 0.57x | $90.40 Million | $51.50 Million | ▲ +64.3% |
| 1995 | 0.35x | $64.90 Million | $22.50 Million | — |