Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.55 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Mativ Holdings Inc. generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mativ Holdings Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mativ Holdings Inc. across 31 annual periods. Also explore MATV net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mativ Holdings Inc. (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mativ Holdings Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $133.80 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $94.80 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $106.60 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $202.20 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▲ +142.9% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $58.10 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -80.7% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $161.60 Million | $935.30 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $160.30 Million | $874.00 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $139.10 Million | $904.90 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $131.00 Million | $995.80 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $129.70 Million | $665.40 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $144.70 Million | $822.10 Million | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $165.90 Million | $697.60 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $178.10 Million | $662.40 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2012 | 0.46x | $171.60 Million | $374.90 Million | ▲ +107.4% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $81.50 Million | $369.30 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2010 | 0.43x | $141.10 Million | $326.20 Million | ▲ +111.3% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $63.40 Million | $309.70 Million | ▲ +177.4% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $33.30 Million | $451.30 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $71.30 Million | $407.20 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $51.80 Million | $377.00 Million | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $38.10 Million | $384.10 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $57.30 Million | $411.10 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $64.80 Million | $376.20 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $63.90 Million | $280.30 Million | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $106.80 Million | $311.90 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2000 | 0.28x | $71.70 Million | $255.40 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $60.70 Million | $245.30 Million | ▼ -0.5% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | $67.10 Million | $269.70 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $67.30 Million | $204.40 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $90.40 Million | $217.60 Million | ▲ +37.1% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $64.90 Million | $214.10 Million | — |