Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.55 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Mativ Holdings Inc. to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mativ Holdings Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mativ Holdings Inc. across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mativ Holdings Inc. (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mativ Holdings Inc.. Check cash flow quality index of Mativ Holdings Inc. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $133.80 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $94.80 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $106.60 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $202.20 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▲ +142.9% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $58.10 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -80.7% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $161.60 Million | $935.30 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $160.30 Million | $874.00 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $139.10 Million | $904.90 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $131.00 Million | $995.80 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $129.70 Million | $665.40 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $144.70 Million | $822.10 Million | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $165.90 Million | $697.60 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $178.10 Million | $662.40 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2012 | 0.46x | $171.60 Million | $374.90 Million | ▲ +107.4% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $81.50 Million | $369.30 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2010 | 0.43x | $141.10 Million | $326.20 Million | ▲ +111.3% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $63.40 Million | $309.70 Million | ▲ +177.4% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $33.30 Million | $451.30 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $71.30 Million | $407.20 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $51.80 Million | $377.00 Million | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $38.10 Million | $384.10 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $57.30 Million | $411.10 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $64.80 Million | $376.20 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $63.90 Million | $280.30 Million | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $106.80 Million | $311.90 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2000 | 0.28x | $71.70 Million | $255.40 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $60.70 Million | $245.30 Million | ▼ -0.5% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | $67.10 Million | $269.70 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $67.30 Million | $204.40 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $90.40 Million | $217.60 Million | ▲ +37.1% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $64.90 Million | $214.10 Million | — |