Mativ Holdings Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mativ Holdings Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.55 Billion) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Mativ Holdings Inc. to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mativ Holdings Inc. (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mativ Holdings Inc. from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mativ Holdings Inc. across 31 annual periods. Check Mativ Holdings Inc. cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Mativ Holdings Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Mativ Holdings Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mativ Holdings Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mativ Holdings Inc. operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $133.80 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $94.80 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $106.60 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $202.20 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▲ +142.9% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $58.10 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -80.7% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $161.60 Million | $935.30 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $160.30 Million | $874.00 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $139.10 Million | $904.90 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $131.00 Million | $995.80 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $129.70 Million | $665.40 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $144.70 Million | $822.10 Million | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $165.90 Million | $697.60 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $178.10 Million | $662.40 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2012 | 0.46x | $171.60 Million | $374.90 Million | ▲ +107.4% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $81.50 Million | $369.30 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2010 | 0.43x | $141.10 Million | $326.20 Million | ▲ +111.3% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $63.40 Million | $309.70 Million | ▲ +177.4% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $33.30 Million | $451.30 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $71.30 Million | $407.20 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $51.80 Million | $377.00 Million | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $38.10 Million | $384.10 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $57.30 Million | $411.10 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $64.80 Million | $376.20 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $63.90 Million | $280.30 Million | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $106.80 Million | $311.90 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2000 | 0.28x | $71.70 Million | $255.40 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $60.70 Million | $245.30 Million | ▼ -0.5% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | $67.10 Million | $269.70 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $67.30 Million | $204.40 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $90.40 Million | $217.60 Million | ▲ +37.1% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $64.90 Million | $214.10 Million | — |