Trio-Tech International Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Trio-Tech International capital reinvestment ratio. Trio-Tech International (TRT) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 2.13x as of December 2025, meaning it reinvests 2% of its operating cash flow ($134.00K) in capital expenditures ($286.00K). See TRT FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of Trio-Tech International (1994–2025)
Capital reinvestment ratio of Trio-Tech International from 1994 to 2025. This chart tracks Trio-Tech International's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 29 annual periods. See how financially flexible is Trio-Tech International to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Trio-Tech International Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Trio-Tech International capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TRT operating cash flow.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.61x | $371.00K | $967.00K | ▲ +1206.6% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $2.72 Million | $542.00K | ▼ -64.0% |
| 2023 | 0.55x | $8.11 Million | $4.50 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2022 | 0.69x | $2.12 Million | $1.47 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2021 | 0.68x | $1.64 Million | $1.11 Million | ▲ +101.0% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | $3.01 Million | $1.02 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2019 | 0.64x | $4.45 Million | $2.84 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | $4.48 Million | $2.31 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2017 | 0.58x | $3.95 Million | $2.29 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2016 | 1.63x | $1.01 Million | $1.66 Million | ▲ +148.1% |
| 2015 | 0.66x | $4.09 Million | $2.69 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2014 | 0.80x | $3.86 Million | $3.09 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2013 | 0.53x | $3.49 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -40.1% |
| 2011 | 0.88x | $4.55 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -99.4% |
| 2010 | 144.90x | $50.00K | $7.25 Million | ▲ +10730.2% |
| 2009 | 1.34x | $1.01 Million | $1.36 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2008 | 1.76x | $1.91 Million | $3.36 Million | ▲ +397.5% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | $7.94 Million | $2.81 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2005 | 2.50x | $924.00K | $2.31 Million | ▲ +345.4% |
| 2004 | 0.56x | $1.86 Million | $1.04 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2003 | 0.72x | $1.26 Million | $899.00K | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2001 | 0.89x | $5.01 Million | $4.45 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2000 | 1.66x | $801.00K | $1.33 Million | ▼ -88.2% |
| 1999 | 14.00x | $50.00K | $700.00K | ▲ +61.5% |
| 1998 | 8.67x | $300.00K | $2.60 Million | ▲ +398.3% |
| 1997 | 1.74x | $2.30 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +325.1% |
| 1996 | 0.41x | $4.40 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -44.5% |
| 1995 | 0.74x | $1.90 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 1994 | 0.63x | $1.60 Million | $1.00 Million | — |