Trio-Tech International (TRT) — Free Cash Flow Generation Index
Trio-Tech International (TRT) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of -1.13x as of December 2025. Free cash flow of $-152.00K represents -1% of operating cash flow ($134.00K). See Trio-Tech International working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Trio-Tech International Free Cash Flow Generation Index (1994–2025)
Historical FCF Generation Index trend for Trio-Tech International across 29 annual periods. Explore TRT operating cash flow to total debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation for Trio-Tech International (1994–2025)
Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for Trio-Tech International. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Trio-Tech International market cap and net worth.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.61x | $-596.00K | $371.00K | $967.00K | ▼ -300.7% |
| 2024 | 0.80x | $2.17 Million | $2.72 Million | $542.00K | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2023 | 0.45x | $3.61 Million | $8.11 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $655.00K | $2.12 Million | $1.47 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $526.00K | $1.64 Million | $1.11 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2020 | 0.66x | $1.99 Million | $3.01 Million | $1.02 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | $1.61 Million | $4.45 Million | $2.84 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2018 | 0.48x | $2.17 Million | $4.48 Million | $2.31 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $1.67 Million | $3.95 Million | $2.29 Million | ▲ +166.5% |
| 2016 | -0.63x | $-643.00K | $1.01 Million | $1.66 Million | ▼ -285.8% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $1.40 Million | $4.09 Million | $2.69 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $770.00K | $3.86 Million | $3.09 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2013 | 0.47x | $1.65 Million | $3.49 Million | $1.84 Million | ▲ +288.4% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $555.00K | $4.55 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2010 | -143.90x | $-7.20 Million | $50.00K | $7.25 Million | ▼ -42482.7% |
| 2009 | -0.34x | $-343.00K | $1.01 Million | $1.36 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2008 | -0.76x | $-1.45 Million | $1.91 Million | $3.36 Million | ▼ -218.0% |
| 2007 | 0.65x | $5.13 Million | $7.94 Million | $2.81 Million | ▲ +143.2% |
| 2005 | -1.50x | $-1.38 Million | $924.00K | $2.31 Million | ▼ -440.2% |
| 2004 | 0.44x | $816.00K | $1.86 Million | $1.04 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $357.00K | $1.26 Million | $899.00K | ▲ +153.9% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $561.00K | $5.01 Million | $4.45 Million | ▲ +117.0% |
| 2000 | -0.66x | $-526.00K | $801.00K | $1.33 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 1999 | -14.00x | $-700.00K | $50.00K | $700.00K | ▼ -82.6% |
| 1998 | -7.67x | $-2.30 Million | $300.00K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -937.3% |
| 1997 | -0.74x | $-1.70 Million | $2.30 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -225.1% |
| 1996 | 0.59x | $2.60 Million | $4.40 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +124.5% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $500.00K | $1.90 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 1994 | 0.38x | $600.00K | $1.60 Million | $1.00 Million | — |