Trio-Tech International (TRT) — Free Cash Flow Generation Index
Trio-Tech International (TRT) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of -1.13x as of December 2025. Free cash flow of $-152.00K represents -1% of operating cash flow ($134.00K). Explore TRT capex to operating cash flow ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Trio-Tech International Free Cash Flow Generation Index (1994–2025)
Historical FCF Generation Index trend for Trio-Tech International across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TRT cash generation efficiency.
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation for Trio-Tech International (1994–2025)
Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for Trio-Tech International. Check Trio-Tech International (TRT) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.61x | $-596.00K | $371.00K | $967.00K | ▼ -300.7% |
| 2024 | 0.80x | $2.17 Million | $2.72 Million | $542.00K | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2023 | 0.45x | $3.61 Million | $8.11 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $655.00K | $2.12 Million | $1.47 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $526.00K | $1.64 Million | $1.11 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2020 | 0.66x | $1.99 Million | $3.01 Million | $1.02 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | $1.61 Million | $4.45 Million | $2.84 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2018 | 0.48x | $2.17 Million | $4.48 Million | $2.31 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $1.67 Million | $3.95 Million | $2.29 Million | ▲ +166.5% |
| 2016 | -0.63x | $-643.00K | $1.01 Million | $1.66 Million | ▼ -285.8% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $1.40 Million | $4.09 Million | $2.69 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $770.00K | $3.86 Million | $3.09 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2013 | 0.47x | $1.65 Million | $3.49 Million | $1.84 Million | ▲ +288.4% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $555.00K | $4.55 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2010 | -143.90x | $-7.20 Million | $50.00K | $7.25 Million | ▼ -42482.7% |
| 2009 | -0.34x | $-343.00K | $1.01 Million | $1.36 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2008 | -0.76x | $-1.45 Million | $1.91 Million | $3.36 Million | ▼ -218.0% |
| 2007 | 0.65x | $5.13 Million | $7.94 Million | $2.81 Million | ▲ +143.2% |
| 2005 | -1.50x | $-1.38 Million | $924.00K | $2.31 Million | ▼ -440.2% |
| 2004 | 0.44x | $816.00K | $1.86 Million | $1.04 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $357.00K | $1.26 Million | $899.00K | ▲ +153.9% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $561.00K | $5.01 Million | $4.45 Million | ▲ +117.0% |
| 2000 | -0.66x | $-526.00K | $801.00K | $1.33 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 1999 | -14.00x | $-700.00K | $50.00K | $700.00K | ▼ -82.6% |
| 1998 | -7.67x | $-2.30 Million | $300.00K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -937.3% |
| 1997 | -0.74x | $-1.70 Million | $2.30 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -225.1% |
| 1996 | 0.59x | $2.60 Million | $4.40 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +124.5% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $500.00K | $1.90 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 1994 | 0.38x | $600.00K | $1.60 Million | $1.00 Million | — |