Trio-Tech International (TRT) — Free Cash Flow Generation Index
Trio-Tech International (TRT) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of -1.13x as of December 2025. Free cash flow of $-152.00K represents -1% of operating cash flow ($134.00K). Read debt load of Trio-Tech International for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Trio-Tech International Free Cash Flow Generation Index (1994–2025)
Historical FCF Generation Index trend for Trio-Tech International across 29 annual periods. Explore Trio-Tech International capex to cash flow ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation for Trio-Tech International (1994–2025)
Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for Trio-Tech International. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see TRT stock market capitalisation.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.61x | $-596.00K | $371.00K | $967.00K | ▼ -300.7% |
| 2024 | 0.80x | $2.17 Million | $2.72 Million | $542.00K | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2023 | 0.45x | $3.61 Million | $8.11 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $655.00K | $2.12 Million | $1.47 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $526.00K | $1.64 Million | $1.11 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2020 | 0.66x | $1.99 Million | $3.01 Million | $1.02 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | $1.61 Million | $4.45 Million | $2.84 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2018 | 0.48x | $2.17 Million | $4.48 Million | $2.31 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $1.67 Million | $3.95 Million | $2.29 Million | ▲ +166.5% |
| 2016 | -0.63x | $-643.00K | $1.01 Million | $1.66 Million | ▼ -285.8% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $1.40 Million | $4.09 Million | $2.69 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $770.00K | $3.86 Million | $3.09 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2013 | 0.47x | $1.65 Million | $3.49 Million | $1.84 Million | ▲ +288.4% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $555.00K | $4.55 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2010 | -143.90x | $-7.20 Million | $50.00K | $7.25 Million | ▼ -42482.7% |
| 2009 | -0.34x | $-343.00K | $1.01 Million | $1.36 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2008 | -0.76x | $-1.45 Million | $1.91 Million | $3.36 Million | ▼ -218.0% |
| 2007 | 0.65x | $5.13 Million | $7.94 Million | $2.81 Million | ▲ +143.2% |
| 2005 | -1.50x | $-1.38 Million | $924.00K | $2.31 Million | ▼ -440.2% |
| 2004 | 0.44x | $816.00K | $1.86 Million | $1.04 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $357.00K | $1.26 Million | $899.00K | ▲ +153.9% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $561.00K | $5.01 Million | $4.45 Million | ▲ +117.0% |
| 2000 | -0.66x | $-526.00K | $801.00K | $1.33 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 1999 | -14.00x | $-700.00K | $50.00K | $700.00K | ▼ -82.6% |
| 1998 | -7.67x | $-2.30 Million | $300.00K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -937.3% |
| 1997 | -0.74x | $-1.70 Million | $2.30 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -225.1% |
| 1996 | 0.59x | $2.60 Million | $4.40 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +124.5% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $500.00K | $1.90 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 1994 | 0.38x | $600.00K | $1.60 Million | $1.00 Million | — |